1977
DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.63324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postharvest weight loss and shrivel in five fruits and five vegetables /

Abstract: Agriculture marketing research is part of a continuing program to reduce marketing losses and to extend the marketing season of agricultural products. This study was undertaken to develop information to aid in alerting produce handlers to a major cause of deterioration (moisture loss with shriveling) in fresh fruits and vegetables during handling, transportation, storage, and packaging.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For 'Leon' snap beans, shriveling became close to the limit of acceptability after 2 d at 20°C, which corresponded to a weight loss of %20%. Others have reported that before shriveling symptoms were noted, an average of 32% of the initial snap beans weight was lost (Hruschka, 1977). The large divergence between weight losses and the onset of the development of visual symptoms related to loss of water might be explained by differences in cultivar morphology (i.e., thickness of the epidermal and hypodermal layers) and maturity at harvest (Reeve and Brown, 1968).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For 'Leon' snap beans, shriveling became close to the limit of acceptability after 2 d at 20°C, which corresponded to a weight loss of %20%. Others have reported that before shriveling symptoms were noted, an average of 32% of the initial snap beans weight was lost (Hruschka, 1977). The large divergence between weight losses and the onset of the development of visual symptoms related to loss of water might be explained by differences in cultivar morphology (i.e., thickness of the epidermal and hypodermal layers) and maturity at harvest (Reeve and Brown, 1968).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even when stored at 28C, weight loss did not surpass 8.5% in any case, resulting in slight shriveling symptoms that presumably would not have affected salability excessively. In other fruit, similar weight losses caused none to moderate shriveling symptoms (Hruschka, 1977). Although weight loss was much lower at 18C, ripening at 28C seems advantageous since it is faster and the increase in MI value per 1% weight loss was higher at 28C (0.23) than at 18C (0.20).…”
Section: Postharvest Biology and Technologymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Just what degree of weight loss can be tolerated before the product becomes unsaleable ranges from as low as 5% for apples (79) and oranges (47) to as high as 37% for green beans (42). But as a general principle, reports indicate that the point at which shriveling is visible is about half of this total figure, i.e.…”
Section: Physical Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But as a general principle, reports indicate that the point at which shriveling is visible is about half of this total figure, i.e. 50% of commercially tolerable weight loss is invisible (42,47,92). Physical, rather than physiological, effects of RH (principally desiccation) predominate for nonclimacteric commodities such as grapes (4) or oranges.…”
Section: Physical Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%