2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postharvest organic matter removal effects on FH layer and mineral soil characteristics in four New Zealand Pinus radiata plantations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
19
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This agreed with various reports of reduced nutrient pools following the increased removal of organic matter at harvest (e.g. Bååth, 1980;Richter et al, 2000;Smaill et al, 2008). The projected effect of OMR regime selection on stem wood biomass production was minimal for the first two ro- …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This agreed with various reports of reduced nutrient pools following the increased removal of organic matter at harvest (e.g. Bååth, 1980;Richter et al, 2000;Smaill et al, 2008). The projected effect of OMR regime selection on stem wood biomass production was minimal for the first two ro- …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Johnson, 1994;Ballard, 2000;Smaill et al, 2008), or soil microbial community biomass and activity (Smaill et al, 2010;Achat et al, 2015). Integration of this additional data would likely also see more variations arise between the different growth trajectories based on other regional differences.…”
Section: Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sweeney et al 2002;Sweeney & Czapka 2004;Geyer et al 2006), which identified herbicide treatments as more advantageous for plant growth, or at least no worse, than weed mats or similar physical barriers. The positive effect on growth associated with weed mats and, to a lesser extent, carpet rolls, may be the results of modification to the soil environment, as these materials also insulate the soil environment, potentially diminishing temperature fluctuations and increasing moisture availability (Smaill et al 2008). Alternately, the lack of substantial increases in growth rates with herbicide application may be the result of spray drift, but given the increased rates of seedling survival with herbicide application this is considered unlikely.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Globally, attention has been given to some site-establishment practices that have negative impacts on long-term site productivity (LTSP). Whole-tree harvesting has been reported to export more nutrients from sites than conventional harvesting (CH), where slash is retained, resulting in a decline in site productivity (Weber 1985;Olsson et al 1996;Hyvönen et al 2000;Egnell and Valinger 2003;Smaill et al 2008;Eisenbies et al 2009;Titshall et al 2013). The conventional harvesting method applied at Usutu involved removing tree stems with bark from sites but not slash (Crous et al 2007b) and is considered to have a less negative effect on site productivity than slash removal due to low nutrient content losses from stem wood (Mälkönen 1976;Olsson et al 1996;Wall 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%