2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2009.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postharvest assessment of fruit quality parameters in apple using both instruments and an expert panel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In apple breeding programs, evaluation of fruit titratable acid,°Brix (soluble solids content) and their ratio has become an indispensible measure for advancing selections and for planning new crosses. Studies attempting to understand the relationship between objective and sensory measurements of apple taste and flavor found that titratable acidity is the best predictor of acid taste, yet sweet taste was difficult to predict using°Brix, the ratio°Brix/titratable acidity or the content of individual sugars and acids (Harker et al 2002;Oraguzie et al 2009;Guerra et al 2010). Fruit acidity had the highest heritability estimate among the sensory traits that included firmness, crispness, texture, juiciness, flavor, sugar, acidity and global taste (Kouassi et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In apple breeding programs, evaluation of fruit titratable acid,°Brix (soluble solids content) and their ratio has become an indispensible measure for advancing selections and for planning new crosses. Studies attempting to understand the relationship between objective and sensory measurements of apple taste and flavor found that titratable acidity is the best predictor of acid taste, yet sweet taste was difficult to predict using°Brix, the ratio°Brix/titratable acidity or the content of individual sugars and acids (Harker et al 2002;Oraguzie et al 2009;Guerra et al 2010). Fruit acidity had the highest heritability estimate among the sensory traits that included firmness, crispness, texture, juiciness, flavor, sugar, acidity and global taste (Kouassi et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A great deal of effort has been expended in the use and development of instrumental techniques for the meaningful estimation of texture attributes. An instrumental measurement is objective and is considered to be more accurate than sensory analysis (Abbott, 1999;Oraguzie et al, 2009). The most important senses used for texture evaluation are related to touch and pressure and, as foods are usually evaluated during mastication, destructive mechanical tests are used as a basis of instrumental measurements (Harker et al, 1997(Harker et al, , 2006Vincent, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, each term has more than one meaning, and thus it is difficult to define both precisely (Chauvin et al, 2008;Roudaut et al, 2002). In food studies, these terms have mainly been described with apple (Allan-Wojtas et al, 2003;Brookfield et al, 2011;Costa et al, 2011;Chauvin et al, 2010;De Belie et al, 2002;Gatti et al, 2011;Oraguzie et al, 2009;Zdunek et al, 2010Zdunek et al, , 2011, as apple is a fruit that is well-known and appreciated for its crunchy texture. In addition, these descriptors have been used in studies on some nut species, for instance, almond Varela et al, 2006;Contador et al, 2015a) and pecan (Ocón et al, 1995).…”
Section: Sensory Evaluation Of Texturementioning
confidence: 99%