Postgraduate palliative care education and curricular issues in Central Asia, Eastern and South-Eastern Europe: Results from a quantitative study

Abstract

Introduction. The WHO Europe Office, together with the European Association for Palliative Care, is supporting the development of an interdisciplinary core curriculum for health care professionals in the European Region, which is to be given to the countries as a recommendation. Material and methods. Between April and September 2018, a research journey to Central Asia, Eastern and SouthEastern Europe took place. It covered two main tasks: collecting quantitative data using a survey and collecting qualitative data by conducting on-site interviews. This article contains the quantitative part. Experts in palliative care education in 23 countries were invited to fill out a questionnaire. The data received from 23 questions were statistically evaluated by IBM SPSS Statistics 25. Results. 27 surveys received from 21 countries were evaluated. In one-third of the surveyed countries, there is still no postgraduate training in palliative care. The main barriers to the development of educational work are limited political interest, followed by limited educational structures, missing curricula, lack of trainers and the limited healthcare system. For 92.6% of all respondents, a WHO-recommended interdisciplinary postgraduate core curriculum would help promote palliative care in their country. Conclusion. There is a high need for postgraduate education in general and the intended core curriculum in particular. The results of the survey, along with those from the interviews in a later second part of the publication, are essential for the development of a core curriculum.

“The education is a mirror of where palliative care stands in Israel today”: An exploration of palliative care undergraduate education at medical schools in Israel

“…Before entering the field, we surveyed all five medical schools in Israel. The survey has been tested and used in the Pan-European study regarding postgraduate PC education to gain internationally comparable as well as country-specific data (Stähli et al, 2020). The survey included questions on (1) background information of the respondent, (2) voluntary and obligatory courses on PC, (3) PC content in different course models, (4) teaching methods, (5) time frame, (6) content, (7) institutions involved, (8) and examinations.…”

Palliative medicine Master Classes for primary care: an evaluation

“…Previous studies have shown that GPs report the need for ongoing palliative care training. 15,16 Often, these courses are designed by specialist services; however, unless the content has practical application to the GP, they will be less effective. 17 Co-designing our educational intervention allowed us to resolve any discordance between the priorities of the expert and the participants, as well as deliver the material in an engaging format.…”

One-week multidisciplinary post-graduate palliative care training: an outcome-based program evaluation

“…The course was free of charge. Since this is a preliminary project serving as a pilot with the intent to be modified based on teachers' experiences and participants' feedback, no formal certification by professional associations for Continuous Medical Education (CME) was obtained [10,11,15].…”

“…Palliative care leaders and educators from 23 countries unanimously agreed that the main barriers to the development of educational work are limited political interest, insufficient educational structures, missing curricula, lack of trainers, and structural constraints of the health care system. They equally agreed that a European recommendation for a multidisciplinary post-graduate training would be of great importance [15].…”