2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2004.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postglacial seismicity offshore mid-Norway with emphasis on spatio-temporal–magnitudal variations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Observing the nomenclature used by Muir Wood (1993), Fenton (1994) and Olesen et al (2004Olesen et al ( , 2013, we conclude that the NVDF should be downgraded from its current status as "A (almost certainly neotectonics)" to "E (very unlikely to be neotectonics). " Because Norway's generalized recurrence estimates for medium-large (M w ≥ 6.0) range between a few to several hundred years (Bungum et al, 2005), and large earthquakes are known to trigger rock avalanches (Keefer, 1984), removing the NVDF from the catalogue of Norwegian paleoseismicity has some potential implications for society.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Observing the nomenclature used by Muir Wood (1993), Fenton (1994) and Olesen et al (2004Olesen et al ( , 2013, we conclude that the NVDF should be downgraded from its current status as "A (almost certainly neotectonics)" to "E (very unlikely to be neotectonics). " Because Norway's generalized recurrence estimates for medium-large (M w ≥ 6.0) range between a few to several hundred years (Bungum et al, 2005), and large earthquakes are known to trigger rock avalanches (Keefer, 1984), removing the NVDF from the catalogue of Norwegian paleoseismicity has some potential implications for society.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ent-day seismicity (e.g., Ahjos & Uski, 1992;Bungum et al, 2005;Redfield & Osmundsen, 2015) -it is a bit problematic to be removing neotectonic faults from the national map instead of adding them. Yet honest words best pierce the ear of grief.…”
Section: The Nvdf Enigmamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For Norway and adjacent areas the recurrence interval of a M5 earthquake is estimated to 10 years, while a M7 earthquake is suggested to occur every 1100 years (Bungum et al, 2005). The seismic activity is largely attributed to isostatic rebound after the last glacial maximum (LGM) and the retreat of the Fennoscandian Ice Sheet (FIS) (Byrkjeland et al, 2000).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Western Norway represents one of the most seismically active areas in Scandinavia (Ahjos & Uski, 1992;Bungum et al, 2005) and it is hence likely that earthquakes could have acted as the main trigger mechanism for such mass failures, as seen for other fjords along the Westand Mid-Norwegian coastline (Bøe et al, 2004). Other potential trigger mechanisms such as climate change and tsunami induced destabilisations are known to…”
Section: Sediment Distribution and Trigger Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%