2018
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201803342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postfunctionalization of Tris(pyridyl) Aluminate Ligands: Chirality, Coordination, and Supramolecular Chemistry

Abstract: Postfunctionalization of the aluminate anion [EtAl(6-Me-2-py) ] (1) (2-py=2-pyridyl) with alkoxide ligands can be achieved by the selective reactions of the lithium salt 1 Li with alcohols in the appropriate stoichiometry. This method can be used to introduce 3- and 4-py functionality in the form of 3- and 4-alkoxymethylpyridyl groups, while maintaining the integrity of the aluminate framework, thereby giving entry to new supramolecular chemistry. Chirality can be introduced either by using a chiral alcohol as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One further potential consequence of incorporating more electropositive (metallic and semimetallic) bridgehead atoms is an increase in the polarity of the bridgehead atom–C bonds to the pyridyl groups. In contrast to more robust tris (2-pyridyl) borate ligands, tris (2-pyridyl)­aluminates [RAl­(2-py) 3 ] − (Figure c) react as bases with H 2 O, alcohols, or carboxylic acids in a controlled manner, providing an interesting route to new aluminates containing additional donor functionality. This behavior has led to new applications as thermally stable pyridyl-transfer reagents as well as reagents for the rapid NMR spectroscopic determination of the enantiomeric excess ( ee ) of chiral alcohols. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One further potential consequence of incorporating more electropositive (metallic and semimetallic) bridgehead atoms is an increase in the polarity of the bridgehead atom–C bonds to the pyridyl groups. In contrast to more robust tris (2-pyridyl) borate ligands, tris (2-pyridyl)­aluminates [RAl­(2-py) 3 ] − (Figure c) react as bases with H 2 O, alcohols, or carboxylic acids in a controlled manner, providing an interesting route to new aluminates containing additional donor functionality. This behavior has led to new applications as thermally stable pyridyl-transfer reagents as well as reagents for the rapid NMR spectroscopic determination of the enantiomeric excess ( ee ) of chiral alcohols. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other metal halides gave bimetallic pyrazolates [M 2 X 2 (Ph 2 pz) 2 (THF) 3 ] with M = Mg, X = Br; M = Co; X = Cl, whereas reactions with first row transition metal halides of Mn, Fe, Ni, and Cu produced intractable powders . These results highlight the difficulties of this chemistry and underpin the need for a better understanding of the factors that might lead to well-defined poly­(pyrazolyl)­aluminate metalloligands and complexes as it has been shown for the related tris­(pyridyl)­aluminates. We surmised that a better performance of the poly­(pyrazolyl)­aluminate ligand system toward its transfer to a transition metal center could be achieved using alkyl groups on the aluminum atom instead of hydrogen to prevent hydride transfer, on the one hand, and, by using a more electron-rich low-valent organotransition metal center, potentially leading to more stable, less reactive complexes. Indeed, we report herein the preparation and full characterization of the new bis- and tris­(pyrazolyl)­aluminates [{Na­(THF) 2 }­{Al­(Ph 2 pz) 2 Me 2 }] ( 1 ) and [{Na­(THF)}­{Al­(Ph 2 pz) 3 ­Me}] ( 2 ) and the complexation of aluminates 1 and 2 to an electron-rich Rh­(I) center to afford [Rh­(COD)­{Al­(Ph 2 pz) 2 ­Me 2 }] ( 3 ) and [Rh­(COD)­{Al­(Ph 2 pz) 3 ­Me}] ( 4 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…9 These results highlight the difficulties of this chemistry and underpin the need for a better understanding of the factors that might lead to well-defined poly(pyrazolyl)aluminate metalloligands and complexes as it has been shown for the related tris(pyridyl)aluminates. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] We surmised that a better performance of the poly(pyrazolyl)aluminate ligand system towards its transfer to a transition metal center could be achieved using alkyl groups on the aluminum atom instead of hydrogen to prevent hydride transfer on the one hand and, on the other hand, by using a more electron rich low-valent organotransition metal center, potentially leading to more stable, less reactive complexes. Indeed, we report herein the preparation and full characterization of the The X-ray crystallographic studies of complexes 1 and 2 reveal mononuclear complexes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; 2-py = 2-pyridyl; Figure b) . However, incorporating heavier and more metallic main-group bridgehead atoms has been shown to provide an important tool for tuning the ligand character, enabling systematic modification of the bite angle, donor/acceptor properties, and reactivity. A case in point is the series of Group 15 tris­(2-pyridyl) ligands E­(6-Me-2-py) 3 (6-Me-2-py = 6-methyl-2-pyridyl; E = As, Sb, Bi) for which changing the bridgehead can be used to provide incremental change in the σ-donor character and (thereby) the catalytic activity and behavior …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%