Shipwreck Hauntography 2021
DOI: 10.5117/9789463727709_post
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postface. On Underwater Séances and Punk Eulogies

Abstract: The postface to the book’s five chapters provides a summary of the overarching argument, which is that nautical archaeology bears with its contemporary practice its Early Modern origins in Christian theology. The resurrection—or savior-scholar—model of nautical archaeology is revisited and critiqued for its tendencies toward paternalism and interventionism, features that appear to replicate key theological tenets emphasizing an existential and ontological hierarchy, with humans oc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The traditional theory books of maritime archaeology courses, Keith Muckelroy’s Maritime Archaeology (1978) and Richard Gould’s edited volume Shipwreck Anthropology (1983), have become dated as they centre heavily on processual and post-processual archaeology. The application of contemporary philosophy to maritime archaeology not only returns agency to the sea (Campbell 2020), but allows us to reconsider our assumptions and the practice of archaeology under water (Rich 2021). The timing is significant, as other fields in the humanities have sought maritime-ontological approaches, including Oceanic Thought and the Blue Humanities, which maritime archaeologists should be contributing to and learning from (Steinberg and Peters 2015; Mentz 2023).…”
Section: Stronger: Returning Agency To the Sea Through Contemporary P...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional theory books of maritime archaeology courses, Keith Muckelroy’s Maritime Archaeology (1978) and Richard Gould’s edited volume Shipwreck Anthropology (1983), have become dated as they centre heavily on processual and post-processual archaeology. The application of contemporary philosophy to maritime archaeology not only returns agency to the sea (Campbell 2020), but allows us to reconsider our assumptions and the practice of archaeology under water (Rich 2021). The timing is significant, as other fields in the humanities have sought maritime-ontological approaches, including Oceanic Thought and the Blue Humanities, which maritime archaeologists should be contributing to and learning from (Steinberg and Peters 2015; Mentz 2023).…”
Section: Stronger: Returning Agency To the Sea Through Contemporary P...mentioning
confidence: 99%