2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10151-007-0340-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Posterior tibial nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence after partial spinal injury: preliminary report

Abstract: Posterior tibial nerve stimulation can be an effective method for the treatment of faecal incontinence caused by partial spinal cord injury.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…39 Although preliminary results for posterior tibial nerve stimulation seem promising, it is important to note that the statistical significance of the improvements in clinical and physiological parameters were not reported and the study involved only two subjects. 39 Level 4 evidence also exists for the use of functional magnetic stimulation on the thorax and lumbosacral nerves (simulation placed at T9 and L3 spinal processes) to reduce colonic transit times and selfreported symptoms of constipation. 40 Pharmacological agents Ten studies (aggregate N ¼ 199) evaluated the effect of treatment strategies using pharmacology to enhance bowel management ( Table 9).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…39 Although preliminary results for posterior tibial nerve stimulation seem promising, it is important to note that the statistical significance of the improvements in clinical and physiological parameters were not reported and the study involved only two subjects. 39 Level 4 evidence also exists for the use of functional magnetic stimulation on the thorax and lumbosacral nerves (simulation placed at T9 and L3 spinal processes) to reduce colonic transit times and selfreported symptoms of constipation. 40 Pharmacological agents Ten studies (aggregate N ¼ 199) evaluated the effect of treatment strategies using pharmacology to enhance bowel management ( Table 9).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Six studies (aggregate N ¼ 74) evaluated electrical or magnetic stimulation on skeletal muscles as a modality to improve colonic transit time in SCI with one study being an RCT (Table 8). [35][36][37][38][39][40] There is Level 1 evidence (from one good-quality RCT, however, with few subjects) that external electrical stimulation of the abdominal wall muscles can improve bowel management for individuals with tetraplegia. 35 They used an overnight abdominal belt with embedded electrodes to provide the stimulus.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most series with high success rates, follow-up is not adequate. There are two studies reporting a success rate of 100%, but with only 1 month of follow-up [21][22]. Follow-up is usually < 10 months in most publications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…78 The absolute contraindications include anal stenosis, recent rectal surgery, active inflammatory bowel disease, active diverticulitis, colorectal cancer and ischaemic colitis. 95,96 The main complication associated with TAI is bowel perforation. However, the rates for this are pretty low, with an estimated risk of irrigation-induced perforation to be one per 50,000 (0.0002%).…”
Section: Transanal Irrigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…95 An RCT by Leroi et al included neurogenic patients, while comparing TTNS with sham stimulation. Although no specific data or analysis were presented specifically for neurogenic patients, it did not report a significant improvement in the number of FI episodes or anorectal physiology.…”
Section: Tibial Nerve Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 99%