2017
DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2017.00069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Posterior Thalamic Nucleus Modulation of Tactile Stimuli Processing in Rat Motor and Primary Somatosensory Cortices

Abstract: Rodents move rhythmically their facial whiskers and compute differences between signals predicted and those resulting from the movement to infer information about objects near their head. These computations are carried out by a large network of forebrain structures that includes the thalamus and the primary somatosensory (S1BF) and motor (M1wk) cortices. Spatially and temporally precise mechanorreceptive whisker information reaches the S1BF cortex via the ventroposterior medial thalamic nucleus (VPM). Other wh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
16
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
5
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We however noted that MD boutons in all layers of PL and in MGB boutons in layers 1, 3, and 5 of A1 are significantly smaller, than MGB boutons in layer 4 of A1. This substantial difference in bouton size is consistent with the notion that the MGB →A1 is a driver pathway ( Casas-Torremocha et al, 2017 ; Viaene et al, 2011 ), whereas the MD →PL pathway may be better described as a modulatory one. The MGB findings are also consistent with previous studies using a comparable approach ( Viaene et al, 2011 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…We however noted that MD boutons in all layers of PL and in MGB boutons in layers 1, 3, and 5 of A1 are significantly smaller, than MGB boutons in layer 4 of A1. This substantial difference in bouton size is consistent with the notion that the MGB →A1 is a driver pathway ( Casas-Torremocha et al, 2017 ; Viaene et al, 2011 ), whereas the MD →PL pathway may be better described as a modulatory one. The MGB findings are also consistent with previous studies using a comparable approach ( Viaene et al, 2011 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…We note that in addition to the significant activation of vessels in the primary somatosensory barrel field (BF), the blood vessel flowing through the posterior complex (PO) and ventral posteromedial nucleus (VPM) of the thalamus also exhibited activation. This result agrees with previous rodent functional studies that mechanoreceptive whisker information reaches the barrel cortex via the thalamic VPM nuclei 23 and the PO is a paralemniscal pathway for whisker signal processing 24 . The velocity time courses and averaged velocity relative change of the 10 trials of vessels V1 and V2 indicate robust blood flow velocity increase in response to the stimulation as shown in Figs.…”
Section: Blood Flow Velocity Change Evoked By Whisker Stimulationsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The VPM-FO and POm-FO pathways also differ in their sensory representation during goal-directed behaviors with the former responding more strongly to self-initiated movements and the latter responding preferably to externally triggered unpredictable whisker movements 49,50 . Distinct sensory representations of self-initiated and external sensory information in parallel thalamocortical circuits have also been reported in the mouse visual system 51 and could be a general feature of sensory systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%