2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00383-011-2870-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Posterior sagittal approach for resection of sacrococcygeal teratomas

Abstract: The aim is to evaluate the ease of access, surgical trauma and cosmetic results of posterior sagittal approach for sacrococygeal teratomas (SCTs). From January 2002 to June 2010, we operated 19 cases of SCT exclusively through posterior sagittal approach. Patients were placed in knee chest position. An elliptical incision was made for the excision of the tumor. Care was taken to preserve all the muscles and other vital tissue in this area. Coccygectomy was performed in all patients. Closure was performed in la… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The posterior-sagittal incision and approach causes less disfigurement, preserves the normal-looking median-raphe and is more cosmetic as compared to the Inverted V-shaped or Chevron incision in the posterior-sacral approach. [2] However, this is suitable for smaller tumors (<5 cm) which are predominantly extrapelvic or have a shallow pelvic extension, not adherent to any vascular structure and located centrally. The muscles of the pelvic floor are better appreciated making the surgery and repair more convenient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The posterior-sagittal incision and approach causes less disfigurement, preserves the normal-looking median-raphe and is more cosmetic as compared to the Inverted V-shaped or Chevron incision in the posterior-sacral approach. [2] However, this is suitable for smaller tumors (<5 cm) which are predominantly extrapelvic or have a shallow pelvic extension, not adherent to any vascular structure and located centrally. The muscles of the pelvic floor are better appreciated making the surgery and repair more convenient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abdominosacral approach was reserved for lesions which could be palpated per abdomen. Sacral route with posterior sagittal incision[2] was preferred for tumors with size <5 cm and located more in the midline. Sacral route with inverted V-shaped or Chevron incision was used for larger or eccentrically located masses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The restoration of a perineum and a gluteal region of normal appearance. Different types of approaches are used, including abdominal and sacral [32][33][34][35]. Other surgical techniques have been proposed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other surgical techniques have been proposed. Jan et al proposed a sagittal incision to limit tissue damage, due to the sagittal orientation of muscles in this region, and to achieve better esthetic results [35]. Laparoscopy offers an excellent vision of this narrow pelvic space, thus preserving the sphincter and nerve structures, guaranteeing a good functional result later.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Operative procedure: The sacral (perineal) approach was used to excise the sacrococcygeal masses either via the classic 'chevron' incision [4], or the vertical posterior sagittal approach [12]. In one case, a combined abdomino-perineal approach was needed to excise a tumor with deep intra-abdominal extension.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%