2009
DOI: 10.1101/lm.919109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Posterior parietal cortex and episodic retrieval: Convergent and divergent effects of attention and memory

Abstract: Functional neuroimaging studies of humans engaged in retrieval from episodic memory have revealed a surprisingly consistent pattern of retrieval-related activity in lateral posterior parietal cortex (PPC). Given the well-established role of lateral PPC in subserving goal-directed and reflexive attention, it has been hypothesized that PPC activation during retrieval reflects the recruitment of parietal attention mechanisms during remembering. Here, we evaluate this hypothesis by considering the anatomical overl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

27
230
6
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 266 publications
(270 citation statements)
references
References 199 publications
27
230
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Brain activations around the IPS related to familiarity have also been frequently found in the healthy population . The location of this peak of activation is congruent with previous fMRI findings, showing that dorsal parietal activations during memory tasks tend to be in the lower part of this region, that is, the lateral bank of the IPS Hutchinson et al, 2009). …”
Section: Familiarity and Parietal Cortexsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Brain activations around the IPS related to familiarity have also been frequently found in the healthy population . The location of this peak of activation is congruent with previous fMRI findings, showing that dorsal parietal activations during memory tasks tend to be in the lower part of this region, that is, the lateral bank of the IPS Hutchinson et al, 2009). …”
Section: Familiarity and Parietal Cortexsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The PPC is commonly divided into the superior parietal lobe (SPL) which lies dorsal to the intra-parietal sulcus (IPS), and the more ventral inferior parietal lobe (IPL), which comprises the angular gyrus (AG), the supramarginal gyrus (SMG) and the temporo-parietal junction (TPJ) Olson & Berryhill, 2009;Hutchinson et al, 2009). Accurate targeting of each subject's right SMG for TMS was achieved using procedures previously described by this and other laboratories (Sack et al, 2009;McKeefry et al, 2008) using a 3-D ultrasound digitizer CMS30P (Zebris, Tübingen, Germany) in conjunction with the BrainVoyager QX software (version 2.0 Brain Innovation, Netherlands).…”
Section: Selection and Identification Of Areas For Tmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The attentional account of PPC retrieval effects, while conceptually attractive at a number of levels, has been challenged by recent meta-analytic (Hutchinson et al 2009) and withinstudy (Sestieri et al 2010(Sestieri et al , 2011 evidence that suggests that the PPC subregions associated with top-down and bottom-up attention are anatomically separable from those associated with episodic retrieval (see also Shannon and Buckner (2004) for evidence of further visuospatial attention/retrieval dissociations). For example, drawing on the published attention and memory literatures, Hutchinson et al (2009) systematically assessed the overlap in PPC between effects of top-down and bottom-up attention and those of item memory strength and recollection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, drawing on the published attention and memory literatures, Hutchinson et al (2009) systematically assessed the overlap in PPC between effects of top-down and bottom-up attention and those of item memory strength and recollection. While the spatial resolution of the implemented meta-analytic approach was inherently limited, Hutchinson's findings suggest that memory strength effects in dorsal PPC may be located lateral to top-down attention effects and that recollection effects in ventral PPC may be located posterior to bottom-up attention effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%