Posterior maxillary ridge augmentation with sinus lift using Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix versus Autogenous Bone Graft

Abstract

Aim:The aim of this study was to assess the effect of augmentation using mineralized plasmatic matrix versus autogenous bone graft on bone formation and implant stability.Methodology: Twenty Implants were inserted in the maxillary premolar and molar region after augmentation of 8 maxillary sinuses in 6 patients, divided into 2 groups, study group received MPM as a graft, while the control group received autogenous particulate bone.Results: There was no statistically significant difference between both groups regarding implant stability immediately after implant insertion; however, after 5-month stability in the study group was statistically significantly higher than the control group. The mean change in bone height after 4 months in the study group was statistically significantly higher than in the control group. Conclusion:The use of MPM in osseous regeneration and implant therapy has a positive impact on the outcome of the grafting surgery when used for open sinus lifting.

Clinical, Radiographic, and Histological Evaluation of the Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix/Xenograft Mixture in Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation (A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)

“…Moreover, in a study comparing the MPM-autograft mixture to autograft alone in maxillary sinus floor elevation, they discovered a statistical difference in bone height between the study and control groups after 4 months. These dissimilar results could be justified by their use of autogenous bone graft solely in their control group, which has an increased resorption rate in contrast to the slow resorption rate of xenograft used in this study [24].…”