2019
DOI: 10.21608/ejhm.2019.22641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present investigation, patients in the instrumented fusion with and without cage groups experienced a VAS (low back pain and leg pain) posttreatment that was significantly better than pretreatment. Our results are agreeing with the results of Bisar et al [26] who discovered that the preoperative VAS for back pain was 9.6 ± 0.9 and the major postoperative score was 1.53 ± 1.126 as well as the preoperative and postoperative VAS scores for leg pain were 9.06 ± 0.7 and 2.0 ± 1.14 respectively with 87,3% reporting good to great results. Additionally, the study of Khan et al [27] reported that TLIF for DS clinical assessment was based on VAS, with the mean preoperative VAS for back pain improving to 2 and the mean preoperative VAS for leg pain improving to 1 (0-5).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In the present investigation, patients in the instrumented fusion with and without cage groups experienced a VAS (low back pain and leg pain) posttreatment that was significantly better than pretreatment. Our results are agreeing with the results of Bisar et al [26] who discovered that the preoperative VAS for back pain was 9.6 ± 0.9 and the major postoperative score was 1.53 ± 1.126 as well as the preoperative and postoperative VAS scores for leg pain were 9.06 ± 0.7 and 2.0 ± 1.14 respectively with 87,3% reporting good to great results. Additionally, the study of Khan et al [27] reported that TLIF for DS clinical assessment was based on VAS, with the mean preoperative VAS for back pain improving to 2 and the mean preoperative VAS for leg pain improving to 1 (0-5).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%