1991
DOI: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1991.tb01812.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Posterior Bayes Factors

Abstract: A general procedure for computing Bayes factors for the comparison of arbitrary models is described, based on the use of the posterior mean of the likelihood under each model rather than the usual prior mean. The use of the posterior mean has several advantages, including reduced sensitivity to variations in the prior and the avoidance of the Lindley paradox in testing point nun hypotheses. The frequency properties of the new procedure are evaluated in standard examples, and a non-standard example is analysed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
238
0
9

Year Published

1993
1993
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 265 publications
(258 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
238
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Difficulties with this approach are well known and are not repeated here, except for the insoluble difficulty from using diffuse priors on unbounded parameter spaces, when the value of B is undefined. Aitkin (1991) has an extensive discussion of this issue.…”
Section: Lff = I Lj(oj)trj(oj)dojmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Difficulties with this approach are well known and are not repeated here, except for the insoluble difficulty from using diffuse priors on unbounded parameter spaces, when the value of B is undefined. Aitkin (1991) has an extensive discussion of this issue.…”
Section: Lff = I Lj(oj)trj(oj)dojmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new general approach described in Aitkin (1991) is to replace integration with respect to the prior by integration with respect to the posterior, giving the 'posterior mean' of the likelihood with L~ = s Lj(Oj)~j(Oj l y')dOj / The 'posterior Bayes factor' is then A Li4 and is interpreted in the same way as B: values of 10 ~ l0 -l and l0 -2 represent no, mild, and strong evidence against MI in favour of M2.…”
Section: Lff = I Lj(oj)trj(oj)dojmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations