2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2003.11.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Posterior antebrachial cutaneous nerve conduction studies in normal subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
11
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
5
11
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These forearm flaps are designed based on the cutaneous nerve trunk and its nutrient vessels, and do not consider the nerve branches and distribution density. For the large branches of the cutaneous nerve of the forearm previously reported, MACN and LACN are usually divided into 2 primary branches [23], which is consistent with our results (Figs 2 and 4). We found that PACN has a single trunk (Fig 2), contrary to Maida's conclusion of PACN being usually divided into medial and lateral branches [6].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These forearm flaps are designed based on the cutaneous nerve trunk and its nutrient vessels, and do not consider the nerve branches and distribution density. For the large branches of the cutaneous nerve of the forearm previously reported, MACN and LACN are usually divided into 2 primary branches [23], which is consistent with our results (Figs 2 and 4). We found that PACN has a single trunk (Fig 2), contrary to Maida's conclusion of PACN being usually divided into medial and lateral branches [6].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Routine nerve conduction studies (NCS) included median, ulnar, superficial radial sensory and radial motor studies [10].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CMAP was satisfactorily localized and all the parameters were reproducible. Similar to other nerves in the literature review, with advancing age there was a gradual decrement of the CMAP amplitudes, reflecting an aging phenomenon, with progressive degeneration of the most distal branches and physiological loss of spinal motorneurons [4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%