2015
DOI: 10.1037/bne0000043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postcontest blockade of dopamine receptors inhibits development of the winner effect in the California mouse (Peromyscus californicus).

Abstract: The winner effect is an accumulation of previous wins that increase future winning. A primary unanswered question about the winner effect is how do individuals integrate information about previous wins? Dopamine (DA) has been implicated because phosphorylated tyrosine hydroxylase (pTH), the rate-limiting enzyme for DA biosynthesis, is elevated following multiple winning experiences. Moreover, DA receptor blockers and agonists influence aggression when administered prior to male-male contests. In the current st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(141 reference statements)
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the dopamine agonist methamphetamine increases aggressive behavior in rodents (Miczek, 1974;Miczek and Haney, 1994;Yu et al, 2014), whereas systemic injections of Drd1or Drd2-family antagonists decrease reactive aggression in residentintruder procedures (Kudryavtseva et al, 1999;Fragoso et al, 2016). In California mice, systemic injections of Drd1-and Drd2-family antagonists delay the emergence of a resident-intruder winner during repeated antagonistic encounters (Becker and Marler, 2015). These data indicate a role for both Drd1 and Drd2 in reactive aggression.…”
Section: Appetitive Aggression Reward In Rodentsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Additionally, the dopamine agonist methamphetamine increases aggressive behavior in rodents (Miczek, 1974;Miczek and Haney, 1994;Yu et al, 2014), whereas systemic injections of Drd1or Drd2-family antagonists decrease reactive aggression in residentintruder procedures (Kudryavtseva et al, 1999;Fragoso et al, 2016). In California mice, systemic injections of Drd1-and Drd2-family antagonists delay the emergence of a resident-intruder winner during repeated antagonistic encounters (Becker and Marler, 2015). These data indicate a role for both Drd1 and Drd2 in reactive aggression.…”
Section: Appetitive Aggression Reward In Rodentsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…A related study showed that D2R, but not D1R, antagonist infusion into the NAc of abnormally aggressive low-anxiety bred rats decreases aggression (Beiderbeck et al 2012). Interestingly, a more recent study found that both D1R and D2R antagonists injected systemically reduced both aggression and chances of winning a fight in experienced mice, but in this scenario the D1R antagonist had a stronger effect (Becker et al 2015). …”
Section: Regulation Of Aggression and Aggression Reward By Lhb Targetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this series of studies, it was further found that the T pulse itself is acting through androgen receptors to influence experience induced increases in ability to win, as aromatase inhibitors (which block conversion of T to estradiol) do not block the effects of T pulses (Trainor et al, 2004). In contrast, dopamine receptor antagonists administered after winning experiences (in mice exhibiting endogenous T pulses) effectively block winner effects (Becker and Marler, 2015). The involvement of dopamine signaling raises the possibility of reward-based mechanisms to be involved in the winner-challenge effect, as described below.…”
Section: Rapid and Long-term Effects Of T Pulses On Social Behavior mentioning
confidence: 99%