2011
DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2011.569325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postcolonialism: interdisciplinary or interdiscursive?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…45 In much the same way Bhabha's argument that the 'European' and the 'indigenous' cannot be conceived as isonomic categories, given the coloniser's attempts to forge 'discriminatory identities', was met by constant 'disruptions' and 'disavowals' by the colonial subjects themselves. 46 Thus, in responding to Susan Okin's critique that 'minority rights' are harmful to multiculturalism since they perpetuate patriarchal practices in the name of 'tradition', Bhabha argues that there are no 'pure minorities' who do not embody liberal ideologies of rights inasmuch as there is no 'pure' dominant/ West (liberal) who is devoid of sexism and patriarchal values. 47 Bhabha writes: 'I do not wish to press the tired and overused charge of ''Eurocentrism'' against such an argument' for '[the]creation of new minorities reveals a liminal, intestinal public sphere that emerges in-between the state and the non-state, in-between individual rights and group needs .…”
Section: Postcolonial Humanism and Rightsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…45 In much the same way Bhabha's argument that the 'European' and the 'indigenous' cannot be conceived as isonomic categories, given the coloniser's attempts to forge 'discriminatory identities', was met by constant 'disruptions' and 'disavowals' by the colonial subjects themselves. 46 Thus, in responding to Susan Okin's critique that 'minority rights' are harmful to multiculturalism since they perpetuate patriarchal practices in the name of 'tradition', Bhabha argues that there are no 'pure minorities' who do not embody liberal ideologies of rights inasmuch as there is no 'pure' dominant/ West (liberal) who is devoid of sexism and patriarchal values. 47 Bhabha writes: 'I do not wish to press the tired and overused charge of ''Eurocentrism'' against such an argument' for '[the]creation of new minorities reveals a liminal, intestinal public sphere that emerges in-between the state and the non-state, in-between individual rights and group needs .…”
Section: Postcolonial Humanism and Rightsmentioning
confidence: 97%