“…In this direction, some recent ICTD projects have embodied an explicit focus on social change through resisting forms of oppression, such as sexism, classism, racism, and ableism (e.g., [102,112,70]). Irani et al affirm that "all design research and practice is culturally located and power laden" and argue for a more explicitly political engagement with social issues like poverty because apolitical stances often occlude "the sometimes highly political causes of poverty" [66]. In their analysis, they draw from Ferguson, an anthropologist, to highlight how these development projects, by aligning with commercial interests, frequently ignore the political and historical trajectories that produce and perpetuate the conditions of poverty [45; see also 82,89].…”