2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2006.32354.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postacne Scarring: A Qualitative Global Scarring Grading System

Abstract: A global acne scarring grading system is presented that is simple to use and may optimize therapeutic intervention. This system would also allow investigators, educators, and proceduralists to compare their cases more accurately and to have a more objective discussion of the efficacy of operative interventions or therapies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
195
1
11

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(226 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
195
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The acne scars were graded according to Goodman and Baron grading (Table 1). 6 The patients were randomised into two groups A and B. Group A received microneedling treatment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acne scars were graded according to Goodman and Baron grading (Table 1). 6 The patients were randomised into two groups A and B. Group A received microneedling treatment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After obtaining informed consent, the patients studied were subjected to detailed history taking, thorough general and dermatological examination, and assessment of acne scar severity before and after treatment through the application of Goodman and Baron quantitative and qualitative grading systems [17,18] in addition to assessment by three physicians committees and reports of patients' satisfaction. The improvement was graded as 0% to 25% (mild), 25% to 50% (moderate), 50% to 75% (marked) and 75% to 100% (excellent).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Patients were explained about the outcome, side effects and complications of the procedure. An informed written consent and photographs were taken prior to the procedure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%