2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2015.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-World War II Italian school buildings: typical and specific seismic vulnerabilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first load distribution is directly proportional to the masses of the structures (PushMass) on each floor; the second load distribution is proportional to the main mode in the considered direction (PushMode). These two load distributions could be considered as two limit states of the building capacity [33,34].…”
Section: Nonlinear Static Analysis: Preliminary Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first load distribution is directly proportional to the masses of the structures (PushMass) on each floor; the second load distribution is proportional to the main mode in the considered direction (PushMode). These two load distributions could be considered as two limit states of the building capacity [33,34].…”
Section: Nonlinear Static Analysis: Preliminary Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also an extension of previous works related to the vulnerability assessment of school buildings [6] with important improvements from the point of view of refined modelling types adopted. Also, in the above-mentioned work, it is emphasized that joint failure is not considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…First, the knowledge of school building typologies is a prerequisite, which leads to the definition of the associated typical and specific building vulnerabilities. An interesting study, that correlates seismic assessment of school buildings (belonging to lower levels of the Italian education system) and vulnerabilities, was carried out in [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It might be worth to remind that IR >1 corresponds to a safe structure, IR<1 corresponds to an unsafe building on the standard of the new constructions [22]. The TR,C in Eq.…”
Section: Nonlinear Static Analysis: Considerations and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%