The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3025453.3025740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-userism

Abstract: HCI is focused on improving the interactions we have with technology and innovating new types of interactions, as well as expanding the types of people for whom those interactions are designed. Central to these efforts is the simultaneously empowering and contested construct of the "user." This paper examines what the construct of the user highlights, as well as what it conceals. We introduce postuserism, a perspective that simultaneously acknowledges the limits of, and proposes alternatives to, the central co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(72 reference statements)
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They use, reflect, and understand-as well as design, make, and produce-both with professional skill and responsibility, and with experience as a user. In line with work on post-userism [5], the multiplicity of relations and subject positions that our participants took did not always clearly fit the categories of "user" and "designer." Being able to interpret the workbooks from multiple subjectivities aligns with the values in design goal of understanding a design from multiple stakeholders' perspectives.…”
Section: Embracing Multiple Subjectivitiesmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…They use, reflect, and understand-as well as design, make, and produce-both with professional skill and responsibility, and with experience as a user. In line with work on post-userism [5], the multiplicity of relations and subject positions that our participants took did not always clearly fit the categories of "user" and "designer." Being able to interpret the workbooks from multiple subjectivities aligns with the values in design goal of understanding a design from multiple stakeholders' perspectives.…”
Section: Embracing Multiple Subjectivitiesmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Baumer et al (2015) emphasize that non-use is a choice that is worth studying, and people often have good reasons for choosing to not participate or use technology. Baumer and Brubaker (2017) argue that the metaphor of a technology "user" is not an appropriate metaphor, because there are a wide variety of patterns of interactions with technology that are not captured by the "user" metaphor. For example, some people use technology indirectly through others (e.g.…”
Section: Non-use Of Online Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In discussing Post Userism, Baumer and Brubaker (2017) carefully consider the user construct as it manifests in design research. They note how, within the broadening scope of design research, notions of 'user' can result in reductive representations when confounded by increasingly blurred boundaries between human and computer, and casts significant doubt on what the 'centre' of design research should be.…”
Section: Taking a Non-anthropocentric Turnmentioning
confidence: 99%