This study investigated the effects of analogy on the elimination of students' misconceptions about direct current circuits, students' achievement and the attitudes towards physics lessons. The sample of this study consisted of 51 11th grade students from two different classes. While one of the classes was the experimental group where analogy was used in the lessons, the other class was the control group where the traditional methods are employed in lessons and this selection was made randomly. When the obtained results were examined, it was seen that teaching with analogy has a significantly positive effect on the elimination of misconception and achievement although it has almost no effect on the attitudes of towards physics.Key Words: analogy, teaching, physics education, students, achievement Simply stated, an analogy is a process of identifying similarities between two concepts. The familiar concept is called the analog and the unfamiliar science concept is called the target (Glynn, 1991), Many models have been presented regarding analogy by Brown and Clement (1989), bridging analogies, Dupin and Joshua (1989), the analogy teaching model, Glynn (1991) Teaching-With-Analogy (TWA) and Zeitoun (1984) the general model of analogy teaching. When using an analogy in the teaching of science, teachers should select an appropriate student world analog to assist in explaining the science concept. The analog and target share attributes that allow a relationship to be identified and contribute to the concept being taught; however, there are features of the analogy that are unlike the target, and these can cause impaired learning if incorrectly matched. Consequently, the use of analogies in the teaching of science does not always produce the intended effects, especially when students take the analogy too far and are unable to separate it from the content being learned. Some students only remember the analogy and not the content under study, while others focus on extraneous aspects of the analogy and draw spurious conclusions about the target concept.Analogies are believed to aid student learning by providing visualisation of abstract concepts, by helping compare similarities of the students' real world with the new concepts, and by increasing students' motivation (Duit, 1991). Concrete analogs facilitate understanding of the abstract concept by pointing to similarities between objects or events in the students' world and the phenomenon under discussion. Analogies can be motivational in that, as the teacher uses ideas from the students' real world experience, a sense of intrinsic interest is generated. From a teaching perspective, the use of analogies can enhance conceptual change learning of science as they open new perspectives (Thiele and