2015
DOI: 10.5455/tjfmpc.198368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-treatment social reintegration experiences of drug addicted adolescents: A qualitative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…People with PUAOD face the strongest stigmatizing attitudes from HRMs and employers. Polat (2015) interviewed 18 adolescents after their drug dependency treatment and found that many had struggled to reintegrate into society because of self‐stigmatization and social exclusion, including employment discrimination. PUAOD‐related stigma is explicit among HRMs and, according to them, among other employees as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People with PUAOD face the strongest stigmatizing attitudes from HRMs and employers. Polat (2015) interviewed 18 adolescents after their drug dependency treatment and found that many had struggled to reintegrate into society because of self‐stigmatization and social exclusion, including employment discrimination. PUAOD‐related stigma is explicit among HRMs and, according to them, among other employees as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that social reintegration, as reported by the official bodies, is not possible in practice and often clients report many difficulties that do not make their reintegration a reality. This is observed in many countries with different health systems (Mayock and Butler, 2021;Polat, 2015). We usually talk about social reintegration if users are considered equal by non-users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Nalbant and Babaoğlan (2016), looked specifically only at adoelscents at risk of exhibiting risk behaviors. Additionally, a significant number of these qualitative studies focuses on a single dimension of risk behaviors (Bayhan & Dalgıç, 2012;Demir and Bademci, 2016;Gilligan and Kypri, 2012;Kingston et al, 2017;Polat, 2015;Taş, Selvitopu, Bora and Demirkaya, 2013). However, this present study attempts to examine the construct through six different dimensions and by focusing on students who have already exhibited risk behaviors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%