Post-Traumatic Implant-Supported Restoration of the Anterior Maxillary Teeth Using Cancellous Bone Block Allografts

Nissan, Joseph; Gross, Ora; Mardinger, Ofer; Ghelfan, Oded; Sacco, R.; Chaushu, Gavriel

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2011.08.002

Cited by 26 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A weighed mean of 4.79 mm (95% CI: 4.51–5.08) horizontal bone gain was computed from 119 grafted sites in 5 studies [15, 24–26, 31]. Allogeneic block graft resorption ranged from 10 ± 10% [24] to 52 ± 25.97% [21] at 6 months after grafting (Figure 3).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

On the Feasibility of Utilizing Allogeneic Bone Blocks for Atrophic Maxillary Augmentation

Monje

Pikos²,

Chan

et al. 2014

BioMed Research International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose. This systematic review was aimed at assessing the feasibility by means of survival rate, histologic analysis, and causes of failure of allogeneic block grafts for augmenting the atrophic maxilla. Material and Methods. A literature search was conducted by one reviewer in several databases. Articles were included in this systematic review if they were human clinical trials in which outcomes of allogeneic bone block grafts were studied by means of survival rate. In addition other factors were extracted in order to assess their influence upon graft failure. Results. Fifteen articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria and subsequently were analyzed in this systematic review. A total of 361 block grafts could be followed 4 to 9 months after the surgery, of which 9 (2.4%) failed within 1 month to 2 months after the surgery. Additionally, a weighed mean 4.79 mm (95% CI: 4.51–5.08) horizontal bone gain was computed from 119 grafted sites in 5 studies. Regarding implant cumulative survival rate, the weighed mean was 96.9% (95% CI: 92.8–98.7%), computed from 228 implants over a mean follow-up period of 23.9 months. Histologic analysis showed that allogeneic block grafts behave differently in the early stages of healing when compared to autogenous block grafts. Conclusion. Atrophied maxillary reconstruction with allogeneic bone block grafts represents a reliable option as shown by low block graft failure rate, minimal resorption, and high implant survival rate.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Interestingly, even though the sample size is small it was noticed the longer the healing, the less bone gain was obtained. On the other hand, allogeneic block grafts resulted in 2 ± 0.5 mm vertical bone augmentation [24, 26]. …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

On the Feasibility of Utilizing Allogeneic Bone Blocks for Atrophic Maxillary Augmentation

Monje

Pikos²,

Chan

et al. 2014

BioMed Research International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[43][44][45][46] However, this is the first study to perform a direct comparison between allograft onlays and native alveolar bone. The results of this study showed that 6 months after onlay bone augmentation using corticocancellous allograft bone blocks, 61.0 AE 13.3% of the volume of biopsy samples was vital bone, which is similar to previous reports.…”

Section: Volume and Architecture Of Bone Augmented With Allograft Onlaysmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…23,24,40,42 Clinical studies have suggested that predictable results could be obtained with implants placed in bone augmented with allograft onlays, achieving a success rate as high as 90% after at least 1-year followup. 30,[43][44][45][46][47] However, in these studies, the quality of bone augmented with allograft onlays and the success rate of implants placed in allograftaugmented bone were not compared with those achieved with other surgical approaches.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Bone Augmented With Allograft Onlays for Implant Placement Could Be Comparable With Native Bone

Al‐Abedalla

Torres

Cortes

et al. 2015

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Placement of endosseous dental implants can be complicated by inadequate bone volume resulting from tooth loss, periodontal disease, trauma, or pathosis 1,2,3 . In such cases, bone or bone substitutes are often used to augment deficient alveolar bone 4 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of deproteinized bone mineral (DBM) as an onlay bone-graft in the rabbit mandible

Al-Jandan

Al-Harkan

Pompura

et al. 2015

The Saudi Journal for Dental Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To evaluate bone regeneration in a heterogenous, deproteinized bone mineral (DBM) when used as an onlay graft. Materials and methods: In this study, eight rabbits received two titanium bone graft holders (TBGHs), one on the left and one on the right lateral surface of the mandible. Each TBGH possessed two cylindrical chambers, which were perforated with numerous sub-millimeter pores. On

show abstract

Post-Traumatic Implant-Supported Restoration of the Anterior Maxillary Teeth Using Cancellous Bone Block Allografts

Cited by 26 publications

References 12 publications

On the Feasibility of Utilizing Allogeneic Bone Blocks for Atrophic Maxillary Augmentation

On the Feasibility of Utilizing Allogeneic Bone Blocks for Atrophic Maxillary Augmentation

Bone Augmented With Allograft Onlays for Implant Placement Could Be Comparable With Native Bone

Evaluation of deproteinized bone mineral (DBM) as an onlay bone-graft in the rabbit mandible

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About