2022
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.945993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-traumatic growth trajectories among frontline healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A three-wave follow-up study in mainland China

Abstract: ObjectivesThe COVID-19 pandemic has taken a significant toll on people worldwide for more than 2 years. Previous studies have highlighted the negative effects of COVID-19 on the mental health of healthcare workers (HCWs) more than the positive changes, such as post-traumatic growth (PTG). Furthermore, most previous studies were cross-sectional surveys without follow-ups. This study draws on PTG follow-up during the COVID-19 outbreak at 12-month intervals for 2 years since 2020. The trajectories and baseline pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The included studies were conducted between 2013 and 2022 in various countries, including China ( K = 26), Israel ( K = 7), the USA ( K = 6), South Korea ( K = 6), Turkey ( K = 3), Poland ( K = 3), Australia (Aggar et al, 2022), Kosovo (Prekazi et al, 2021), Spain (Rodríguez‐Rey et al, 2019) and Palestine (Shamia et al, 2015), each contributing one study. Out of the included studies, 53 had a cross‐sectional design, and 2 were longitudinal cohort studies (Jesse, 2013; Yan et al, 2022) (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The included studies were conducted between 2013 and 2022 in various countries, including China ( K = 26), Israel ( K = 7), the USA ( K = 6), South Korea ( K = 6), Turkey ( K = 3), Poland ( K = 3), Australia (Aggar et al, 2022), Kosovo (Prekazi et al, 2021), Spain (Rodríguez‐Rey et al, 2019) and Palestine (Shamia et al, 2015), each contributing one study. Out of the included studies, 53 had a cross‐sectional design, and 2 were longitudinal cohort studies (Jesse, 2013; Yan et al, 2022) (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the nurses included in the studies were female (88%, N = 31,361), with ages ranging from 18 to 62.28 years. Most of the nurses were various clinical nurses (84.1%, N = 29,947), while 12 studies focused on front‐line nurses during the COVID‐19 pandemic (13.74%, N = 4896) (Atay et al, 2022; Cui, Hu, et al, 2021; Cui, Wang, et al, 2021; Li et al, 2020; Liu et al, 2021; Mo et al, 2021; Peng et al, 2021; Prekazi et al, 2021; Sarıalioğlu et al, 2022; Yan et al, 2022; Yim & Kim, 2022; Zhang, Zhang, et al, 2021) and 4 studies focused on ICU nurses (2.26%, N = 701) (Chang et al, 2021; Ma et al, 2022; Rodríguez‐Rey et al, 2019; Shao et al, 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering the data collection period of our study conducted in mid-2022, in the third year of the COVID-19 pandemic, the primary healthcare workers may have become more resilient. A cohort study in three waves of the COVID-19 pandemic shows that health professionals developed a stronger resiliency during the pandemic and actuated their coping strategies (20). Resilient health workers during the pandemic can cope with their stress, preserve their di culties and mobilize a response to always focus on their achievement (20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cohort study in three waves of the COVID-19 pandemic shows that health professionals developed a stronger resiliency during the pandemic and actuated their coping strategies (20). Resilient health workers during the pandemic can cope with their stress, preserve their di culties and mobilize a response to always focus on their achievement (20). The resilience of health workers also explains our other ndings that the health workers burdened with multiple tasks related to COVID-19 are likely more fruitful for primary health workers rather than only working monotonously on COVID-19 handling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%