Oncogene and Cancer - From Bench to Clinic 2013
DOI: 10.5772/53541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-Transcriptional Regulation of Proto-Oncogene c-fms in Breast Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present data indicates that the 69 nt CSF-1R binding element confers net translational repression, and that the repression effect is very significant in the presence of cellular RNA binding proteins, including vigilin and HuR ( Figure 3 ). We have shown that the affinity of vigilin to this pyrimidine-rich region in the CSF-1R mRNA 3′UTR is at least 3-fold stronger than that of HuR in BT20 breast cancer cells by in vitro competition assay [19] . Thus, this specificity of binding of the 69 nt pyrimidine-rich region to vigilin, may explain why disruption of the pyrimidine-rich sequence appears to more significantly affect vigilin-specific actions, rather than those of HuR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present data indicates that the 69 nt CSF-1R binding element confers net translational repression, and that the repression effect is very significant in the presence of cellular RNA binding proteins, including vigilin and HuR ( Figure 3 ). We have shown that the affinity of vigilin to this pyrimidine-rich region in the CSF-1R mRNA 3′UTR is at least 3-fold stronger than that of HuR in BT20 breast cancer cells by in vitro competition assay [19] . Thus, this specificity of binding of the 69 nt pyrimidine-rich region to vigilin, may explain why disruption of the pyrimidine-rich sequence appears to more significantly affect vigilin-specific actions, rather than those of HuR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Translational repression and mRNA decay may be reversible by competing CSF-1R mRNA with other RNA binding proteins. We have previously characterized one of them, HuR, with a competition between vigilin and HuR demonstrated for binding this element, with opposing effects on CSF-1R expression [9] , [13] , [19] . The binding of vigilin to the pyrimidine-rich sequence significantly decreases CSF-1R expression ( Figures 2 and 4 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Competition of vigilin with another RBP for a binding site is also the basis for regulation of the proto-oncogene c-fms mRNA in human breast cancer. 4 Here, vigilin competes with HuR, a member of the ELAV family of RBPs, 4,78,79 but in contrast to vitellogenin mRNA, upregulated expression of vigilin induces the destabilization of c-fms mRNA. HuR has been reported to bind and stabilize a number of mRNAs 80 and the competition of the two proteins for the same 69 nt element in the c-fms 3 0 UTR could regulate c-fms mRNA translation and stability.…”
Section: Regulation Of Mrna Stability By Vigilinmentioning
confidence: 99%