The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00234-020-02576-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-stroke ASPECTS predicts outcome after thrombectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ASPECTS, unlike the precise infarct volume, can be readily evaluated on follow-up CT and has proven to be a valuable outcome predictor. This finding aligns with studies by Leker et al, who demonstrated that post-stroke ASPECTS predicts outcomes post-thrombectomy 49 . Our findings align with those from Monteiro et al who predicted the functional outcome three months post-stroke in 425 patients treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) 8 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…ASPECTS, unlike the precise infarct volume, can be readily evaluated on follow-up CT and has proven to be a valuable outcome predictor. This finding aligns with studies by Leker et al, who demonstrated that post-stroke ASPECTS predicts outcomes post-thrombectomy 49 . Our findings align with those from Monteiro et al who predicted the functional outcome three months post-stroke in 425 patients treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) 8 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our results showed that pc-ASPECTS was significant in the univariate analysis, but it was not predictable in the multivariate regression analysis. As reported in previous studies, the roles of pc-ASPECTS are heterogeneous in prognostic prediction, and the optimal cut-off value associated with favorable outcomes is still controversial 24–26. The heterogeneous results indicated that imaging criteria for treatment candidates need further exploration based on individual baseline characteristics such as NIHSS score, age or time to treatment, which are known as predictors of outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It has been reported that postoperative indicators such as RNI, cerebral tissue reperfusion examinations, and follow-up infarct volumes could predict prognosis ( 4 , 12 , 14 , 25 , 26 ), whereas the presence of anesthesia, sedation, hyperthermia, and a “stunned brain” affects the assessment of NIHSS scores during the early postoperative period ( 27 ). Thus, RNI is generally assessed at 24 h after thrombectomy, and the follow-up of infarct volumes is performed later (generally between 24 h and 1 week) ( 14 , 25 , 26 ). The evaluation of perfusion status by CTP or MRI within 24 h after thrombolysis or thrombectomy can also predict prognosis, while recanalization cannot ( 5 , 28 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%