2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2011.06.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-spinel transitions in pyrolite and Mg2SiO4 and akimotoite–perovskite transition in MgSiO3: Precise comparison by high-pressure high-temperature experiments with multi-sample cell technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

31
81
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
31
81
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The ab initio phase boundary is localized at slightly higher pressures (≈1-2 GPa) than those determined by other HP-HT experiments [124,127,129,130,133] (see Figure 11a). The calculated Clapeyron slope (i.e., dP/dT = −2.53 MPa/K) agrees well with those obtained by the most part of experimental investigations (ranging from −4.0 to −2.0 MPa/K) [121,[124][125][126][127]131,132,135], while other works [129,130,133,134] suggest a more gentle slope of the phase boundary (i.e., between −2.0 and −1.0 MPa/K or even less) (see Table 5). B3LYP results are in qualitative agreement with previous GGA calculations [137][138][139], whereas LDA [137] severely underestimates transformation pressures of the post-spinel reaction (see Figure 11b).…”
Section: Phase Equilibrium Calculation At Hp-ht: the Post-spinel Phassupporting
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The ab initio phase boundary is localized at slightly higher pressures (≈1-2 GPa) than those determined by other HP-HT experiments [124,127,129,130,133] (see Figure 11a). The calculated Clapeyron slope (i.e., dP/dT = −2.53 MPa/K) agrees well with those obtained by the most part of experimental investigations (ranging from −4.0 to −2.0 MPa/K) [121,[124][125][126][127]131,132,135], while other works [129,130,133,134] suggest a more gentle slope of the phase boundary (i.e., between −2.0 and −1.0 MPa/K or even less) (see Table 5). B3LYP results are in qualitative agreement with previous GGA calculations [137][138][139], whereas LDA [137] severely underestimates transformation pressures of the post-spinel reaction (see Figure 11b).…”
Section: Phase Equilibrium Calculation At Hp-ht: the Post-spinel Phassupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Ab initio B3LYP results show an excellent agreement with the in situ LH-DAC X-ray diffraction study of Shim et al [128] and the multi-anvil experiments of Ishii et al [132], as well as with calculations based on accurate calorimetric measurements by Akaogi and Ito [126] and Akaogi et al [131] (Figure 11a; see also Figure Table 5), although a recent study found a lower enthalpy of reaction [134]. The ab initio phase boundary is localized at slightly higher pressures (≈1-2 GPa) than those determined by other HP-HT experiments [124,127,129,130,133] (see Figure 11a).…”
Section: Phase Equilibrium Calculation At Hp-ht: the Post-spinel Phassupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2,3 This limitation is primarily a consequence of hardness of WC anvils. While for many years, the upper half of the lower mantle was considered relatively uninteresting; recent seismological studies 4 have shown that several subducted slabs penetrate into the lower mantle and stagnate at ∼1000 km, corresponding to 40 GPa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%