2019
DOI: 10.51196/srz.17.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post Post-Truth: Epistemologies of Disintegration and the Praxeology of Truth

Abstract: Our truth culture has changed. Yet we are not living in a post-truth era but in a truth era – an observation of the ongoing debates shows a proliferation of invocations of truth. This paper argues that in order to grasp this transition, we should not refer to classical truth theories or common oppositions such as knowledge and belief, objectivity and subjectivity. Instead, we should focus on concrete practices in concrete situations: on “doing truth.” This paper introduces the concept of a “praxeology of truth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, subjectivation usually has a social psychological dimension: discursive practices are often aimed at intensifying intergroup anxiety and may strengthen in-group favouritism (see Nawrocki 2021). One of the best examples here is the use of conspiracy theories, which often serve to unite populists' supporters: they demand taking sides and merge epistemic choice with identity declaration (see Kleeberg, 2019), such as with Trump's 'Big Lie' or Law and Justice's Smoleńsk conspiracy. Importantly, the epistemic approach assumes that it is the interplay of cognitive, affective, and epistemic mechanisms that may produce effects such as prejudice or wilful ignorance of certain information and not some 'natural' disposition of individuals belonging to a populist epistemic community.…”
Section: Cognitive Affective and Social Psychological Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, subjectivation usually has a social psychological dimension: discursive practices are often aimed at intensifying intergroup anxiety and may strengthen in-group favouritism (see Nawrocki 2021). One of the best examples here is the use of conspiracy theories, which often serve to unite populists' supporters: they demand taking sides and merge epistemic choice with identity declaration (see Kleeberg, 2019), such as with Trump's 'Big Lie' or Law and Justice's Smoleńsk conspiracy. Importantly, the epistemic approach assumes that it is the interplay of cognitive, affective, and epistemic mechanisms that may produce effects such as prejudice or wilful ignorance of certain information and not some 'natural' disposition of individuals belonging to a populist epistemic community.…”
Section: Cognitive Affective and Social Psychological Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That implies that praxeology is one of the studies that is not only related to what people do, and how they do it, but also related to what they think, and how they do it. Kleeberg (2019) states that this praxeological approach can be related to the problem of truth that can be proven either historically, discursively or epistemologically where this approach must fulfill two functions, which are related to the norm of truth and assert its validity while being able to see various deviations that exist.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework Of Praxeological-didactical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“… See Cain et al 2019a;Cain et al 2019b;Kleeberg and Suter 2014;Kleeberg 2019, where these approaches are further elaborated.3 See, e. g., Lässig 2008; Szöllösi-Janze 2000; Veit 2011. An overview is presented in Sommer et al 2017.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%