2010
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0914199107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-Paleozoic crinoid radiation in response to benthic predation preceded the Mesozoic marine revolution

Abstract: It has been argued that increases in predation over geological time should result in increases in defensive adaptations in prey taxa. Recent in situ and laboratory observations indicate that cidaroid sea urchins feed on live stalked crinoids, leaving distinct bite marks on their skeletal elements. Similar bite marks on fossil crinoids from Poland strongly suggest that these animals have been subject to echinoid predation since the Triassic. Following their near-demise during the end-Permian extinction, crinoid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
116
1
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(38 reference statements)
4
116
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Predator identity inferred from diagnostic marks (e.g., gastropod boring scars), stomach contents, or recent observations gives little indication of pervasiveness (3,5). Large-scale predation pressure inferred from escalation of, or persistent damage to, prey defenses reveals little about specific relationships and might not reflect real trends (3,4,6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Predator identity inferred from diagnostic marks (e.g., gastropod boring scars), stomach contents, or recent observations gives little indication of pervasiveness (3,5). Large-scale predation pressure inferred from escalation of, or persistent damage to, prey defenses reveals little about specific relationships and might not reflect real trends (3,4,6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first was a diversification climax starting in the Tournaisian stage (359-345 Mya), establishing an "Age of Crinoids" evidenced by widespread encrinital limestones (12). The second was faunal turnover in the later Mississippian (345-318 Mya), as increased extinction rates for camerate crinoids resulted in the advanced cladid-dominated late Paleozoic evolutionary fauna (5,12,19).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, currently there is no evidence for fundamental differences in the chemical defense of comatulids and stalked crinoids that might explain the offshore displacement of stalked crinoids. In contrast to a possible deterrent function of the pigments against fishes, such a function against benthic predation by echinoids is not supported, because indications of predation by echinoids have been observed for (likely hypericinoid-containing) crinoids of the order Encrinida (31). A further defensive function of the pigments might be antifouling, because most echinoderms are free from fouling organisms, and antifouling properties have been reported for ethanolic extracts of echinoderms (32).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Among these traits, autotomy planes and crawling abilities, which probably originated in the Triassic holocrinids and isocrinids (but see also Donovan 2012), are two of the best known textbook examples of dramatic functional changes in the evolutionary history of crinoids (e.g., Hagdorn 2011). Baumiller et al (2010) argued that this novelty evolved as an effective escape strategy from echinoid predators during the so-called Mesozoic marine revolution. The ability to shed the stalk, which allowed active relocation, in the oldest post-Paleozoic stem-group isocrinids has been supported by taphonomic data (preferential disarticulation at the distal facets of nodals; see Baumiller and Hagdorn 1995), functional morphology (occurrence of highly flexible muscular arms, lack of holdfast; see, e.g., Hagdorn 2011) and micromorphology (occurrence of synostosial stereom in the distal facets of nodals, Gorzelak 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…d-f Gypsum casts (hypichnia) of the above illustrated traces (a-c; correspondingly). Scale bars 1 cm 2005), but also through major functional changes (Baumiller et al 2008(Baumiller et al , 2010. More specifically, Paleozoic crinoids, dominated by sessile forms, were replaced by predominantly motile taxa displaying many morphological and behavioral novelties (e.g., Gorzelak et al 2012Gorzelak et al , 2016.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%