2018
DOI: 10.1111/jdv.15299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post‐orf epidermolysis bullosa acquisita

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3,11 All patients with mucosal involvement presented with oral lesions followed by involvement of nostrils (3 of 13 [23%]) and conjunctivae (2 of 13 [15%]). To date, the target antigen in orf-triggered AIBD has remained unknown in all but 3 cases, which included reactivity against Col7 (cases 5 and 12) 6,7 and against laminin 332 (case 4). 5 Here, we describe in detail a patient with orf-induced antilaminin 332 (bullous) pemphigoid and detected serum antilaminin 332 reactivity in another 4 previously reported patients with orf-induced AIBD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3,11 All patients with mucosal involvement presented with oral lesions followed by involvement of nostrils (3 of 13 [23%]) and conjunctivae (2 of 13 [15%]). To date, the target antigen in orf-triggered AIBD has remained unknown in all but 3 cases, which included reactivity against Col7 (cases 5 and 12) 6,7 and against laminin 332 (case 4). 5 Here, we describe in detail a patient with orf-induced antilaminin 332 (bullous) pemphigoid and detected serum antilaminin 332 reactivity in another 4 previously reported patients with orf-induced AIBD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, human orf has recently generated considerable interest owing to increasing evidence of its role in inducing autoimmune bullous diseases (AIBDs). [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] Previously reported cases of orf-induced AIBDs have all been characterized as subepidermal blistering disorders. Hereby, all but 1 patient showed mucocutaneous lesions with predominant skin involvement.…”
Section: Clinical and Serological Characterization Of Orf-induced Imm...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is a plethora of serological studies with commercial and in F I G U R E 2 Test evaluation: (A) distribution of anti-Dsg3 IgG values for controls (n = 104) and PV (n = 104) sera (cut-off 20 RE/mL; one value located outside the axis limit: 3555 RE/mL) (B) Distribution of POCScan anti-Dsg3 IgG values for controls (n = 104) and PV (n = 96) sera (cut-off 60 mV) (C) ROC analysis based on sensitivity and specificity of POCScan results (D) 10 × 10 dot plots for specificity (control) and sensitivity (PV) for the combination of human observer groups A and B loco developed Dsg3 ELISA for the serological detection of antidesmoglein 3 IgG autoantibodies. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] With 78.1% (observers A and B) and 72.9% (POCScan), the sensitivity of the Dsg3 LFIA is lower compared to the available ELISA system, which show a sensitivity between 85 and 100%. The specificity of the Dsg3 LFIA was in the range of 94.2% (POCScan) to 97.1% (observers A + B), while the specificity of the Dsg3 ELISA ranged from 95.7% to 100%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…anti-Dsg3 IgG, lateral flow immunoassay, pemphigus vulgaris detection of anti-Dsg1/3 autoantibodies. [1] As ELISA index correlates with the extent or activity of the disease, [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] this method represents the "gold standard" for the serological detection of anti-Dsg1/3 IgG, respectively. [15] Nevertheless, due to the rareness of the disease (incidence of 1-5/10 6 ), diagnostic ELISA is only performed in specialized clinical centres and requires an adequately equipped serological laboratory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%