“…Scales described in veterinary studies have been either verbal ordinal 3-to 5-point scales (with descriptors such as none, mild, moderate, severe), numerical (ordinal) rating scales (e.g., a 4-to 10-point scale), categorized numerical rating scales with ordinal ranking of individual behaviors within three to seven "categories" (e.g., 0-2 points assigned for various behaviors within each of several behavior categories such as vocalization, movement, respiratory pattern, and posture), or visual analog scales (VAS 1 ). Verbal, numerical, categorized numerical, VAS, or a combination of two or more of these scales have been used to evaluate behavior in dogs in at least six studies of OHE or castration (Firth and Haldane 1999;Lascelles et al 1997;Lemke et al 2002;Slingsby and Waterman-Pearson 2000;Slingsby et al 2001); in 13 studies of orthopedic surgery (Brodbelt et al 1997;Budsberg et al 2002;Conzemius et al 1997;Day et al 1995;Grisneaux et al 1999;Hendrix et al 1996;Lascelles et al 1994;Mbugua et al 1989;Nolan and Reid 1993;Pibarot et al 1997;Sammarco et al 1996;Taylor and Houlton 1984;Vesal et al 1996); one study of auricular surgery (Buback et al 1996); seven studies of canine thoracotomies (Conzemius et al 1994;Pascoe and Dyson 1993;Popilskis et al 1991;Stobie et al 1995;Thompson and Johnson 1991;Vainio and Ojala 1994;Walsh et al 1999); and five studies of other soft tissue and/or orthopedic surgery patients ( Holton et al 1998a,b;Mathews et al 1996Mathews et al , 2001Reid and Nolan 1991). All of these scales are characterized by reliance on subjective evaluation of behaviors whose correlation with other behavioral or physiological indic...…”