The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2013.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-Neogene right-lateral strike–slip tectonics at the north-western edge of the Lut Block (Kuh-e–Sarhangi Fault), Central Iran

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This scenario is also in good agreement with most of the kinematic evolution of the main Central Iran faults (Figure ): (a) activation of the N‐S right‐lateral strike‐slip fault of the eastern Iran since the last 5 Ma and associated counterclockwise rotation of the Central Iranian Blocks [ Walker and Jackson , ; Walker and Khatib , ; Nozaem et al ., ]; (b) more recent (Plio‐Quaternary) kinematic shift between left‐lateral to right‐lateral strike‐slip fault in the northern border of Central Iran, especially along the Doruneh fault [ Farbod et al ., ; Calzolari et al ., , ].…”
Section: Interpretation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scenario is also in good agreement with most of the kinematic evolution of the main Central Iran faults (Figure ): (a) activation of the N‐S right‐lateral strike‐slip fault of the eastern Iran since the last 5 Ma and associated counterclockwise rotation of the Central Iranian Blocks [ Walker and Jackson , ; Walker and Khatib , ; Nozaem et al ., ]; (b) more recent (Plio‐Quaternary) kinematic shift between left‐lateral to right‐lateral strike‐slip fault in the northern border of Central Iran, especially along the Doruneh fault [ Farbod et al ., ; Calzolari et al ., , ].…”
Section: Interpretation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this view, the active DF is interpreted as a thrust‐dominated, segmented, sinistral transpressive fault system. To the south, the Miocene–Pliocene tectonic reorganization is recorded by activation of the dextral NE–SW (Kuh Sahrangi Fault; Nozaem et al, ) and E–W (Kuh Faghan Fault; Calzolari, Rossetti, et al, ; Calzolari et al, ) fault strands, whose activity is documented throughout the Quaternary times (Calzolari, Della Seta, et al, ) (Figure h).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Iran region, the tectonic boundaries of the continental blocks that make‐up the hinterland domain of the Zagros convergence zone record a prolonged history of deformation and reactivation since Neoproterozoic times (Bagheri, Madhanifard, & Zahabi, ; Kargaranbafghi, Foeken, Guest, & Stuart, ; Nozaem et al, ; Ramezani & Tucker, ; Rossetti et al, ; Tadayon et al, ; Verdel et al, ). Such tectonic zones are presently dominated by wrench tectonics that accommodates and transfers the intraplate residual convergence transmitted from the collisional boundary across the Central Iran region (the assembly of the tectonic zones known as Central Domain and the Central‐East Iranian Microcontinent [hereafter referred as CEIM]; Figure ) (Khodaverdian, Zafarani, & Rahimian, ; Nilforoushan et al, ; Vernant et al, ; Walpersdorf et al, ), in response to a geodynamic scenario dominated by ~N–S‐directed convergence since at least 52 Ma (Berberian, , ; Berberian & Yeats, ; Jackson, Haines, & Holt, ; McQuarrie et al, ; Nowroozi & Mohajer‐Ashjai, ; Walker & Jackson, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent paleomagnetic data provide support for this suggestion [ Mattei et al ., ]. The development of the faults in the prolongation of the Hormuz promontory might have been induced by the northward impingement of the Hormuz promontory into the Iranian crust, as observed in similar contexts in the world [e.g., Tapponnier and Molnar , ], and favored by the existence of inherited NS faults and sutures in this area [e.g., Walker and Khatib , ; Cifelli et al ., ; Nozaem et al ., ].…”
Section: Interpretation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of fault maps have thus been produced. However, those maps either show most of the faults with simplified traces [e.g., Walker and Jackson , ; Walker et al ., ; Meyer and Le Dortz , ; Le Dortz et al ., ; Allen et al ., ; Farbod et al ., ; Nozaem et al ., ] or provide very detailed mapping of isolated faults or local fault sections only [e.g., Walker and Jackson , ; Walker et al ., ; Meyer et al ., ; Walker and Khatib , ; Meyer and Le Dortz , ; Fattahi et al ., ; Allen et al ., ; Farbod et al ., ]. To examine the relationship between major and secondary faults and to properly analyze the GPS data, we need a georeferenced, precise tectonic map that shows all active faults together, major and secondary, in great detail.…”
Section: Overall Organization Of Active Faults In Eastern Iranmentioning
confidence: 99%