Key words: ethics, latent tuberculosis, immigration, public health, interferongamma release assays, tuberculin test Aust NZ J Public Health. 2012; 36:325-8 doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2012 could operate in a variety of ways, which would aim to detect LTBI in immigrants to Australia or NZ and provide treatment to prevent later disease.In addition to any logistic considerations, such policies raise a number of ethical implications that require careful analysis prior to implementation. The focus of this article is to review the potential alternatives for the introduction of LTBI screening into Australasian immigration policy, with a particular emphasis on the ethical evaluation of various strategies.
MethodsCurrent Australian and NZ immigration policies related to tuberculosis were reviewed. Relevant Federal Government department websites and publications were accessed to summarise immigration screening approaches to tuberculosis infection.Introduction of screening and treatment for LTBI could be incorporated into new public health policy with a variety of permutations. Key elements of such changes were extracted and described in order to allow ethical evaluation of various permutations in policy development.
Denholm, McBryde and Brown ArticleA number of frameworks have been proposed for the ethical evaluation of public health policy, including immigration screening. Some approaches have emphasised national sovereignty, with its rights (or even obligations) to exercise immigration control on behalf of its citizens. 8 Other approaches have rejected national interests in favour of more universal considerations. Particularly influential in this regard have been approaches based on human rights considerations, such as the models adapted for assessment of mandatory HIV screening.9,10 Such approaches emphasise limiting the burdens of screening on immigrants, particularly through appropriate targeting and adopting the least restrictive alternatives which achieve the desired public health benefit.While a number of frameworks could be applied to the evaluation of public health policy, few have been developed specifically with this context in mind. One exception is the principle-based analytic approach proposed by Nancy Kass.11 This approach seeks to take into account the dynamic tension between harms and benefits to individuals and societies, and encourages systematic evaluation of public health policy on ethical grounds. The central concepts within this framework are the design of public health policy which minimises burdens and maximises benefits, and the fair allocation of those burdens and benefits. This present analysis adopts these principles in order to consider the ethical implications of potential public health policy changes in relation to immigration screening for LTBI.
Results
Existing Australasian immigration policiesCurrently, most applicants for immigration to Australia or NZ are required to undergo an assessment for active tuberculosis. 12,13 Requirements for both countries are similar, primarily consisti...