2007
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-marketing surveillance study of the efficacy and safety of vardenafil among patients with erectile dysfunction in primary care

Abstract: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of vardenafil in primary care, we undertook a post-marketing surveillance study in 384 men with erectile dysfunction (ED), enrolled by 22 family physicians in Korea, from July 2004 to August 2005. Of the 384 patients enrolled, 343 (89.3%) returned for efficacy assessment and safety evaluation. Among the latter, 279 patients (81.3%) reported that their erectile function improved, 292 (92.1%) showed enhanced IIEF (International Index of Erectile Function)-5 scores and 265 (77.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(36 reference statements)
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vardenafil also showed good safety across all patient subgroups. The overall incidence of AEs in the present analysis (3.6%) was similar to that observed for the individual REALISE study populations from Germany (1.4%) [26], Indonesia (2.9%) [23], and Korea (5.2%) [32], and was very low in comparison with the incidence of AEs seen with vardenafil use in other clinical trials (13–45%) [13,18,19,33,34]. The most frequently reported AEs were transient and mild, and were typical of those noted previously with vardenafil and other PDE5 inhibitors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Vardenafil also showed good safety across all patient subgroups. The overall incidence of AEs in the present analysis (3.6%) was similar to that observed for the individual REALISE study populations from Germany (1.4%) [26], Indonesia (2.9%) [23], and Korea (5.2%) [32], and was very low in comparison with the incidence of AEs seen with vardenafil use in other clinical trials (13–45%) [13,18,19,33,34]. The most frequently reported AEs were transient and mild, and were typical of those noted previously with vardenafil and other PDE5 inhibitors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Headache, facial flushing, nasal congestion and dyspepsia are the most common adverse events (19,21–23). Postmarketing surveillance of PDE5 inhibitors has provided additional data that, in general, indicate a safety profile consistent with that reported in premarketing clinical studies (24–30). However, there are some gaps in the knowledge base.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The most common visual disturbances are increased blue tinge in the visual image and an increased sensitivity to light 242244 . The rate of occurrence for these symptoms is low; in 3–11% of men taking sildenafil 25–100 mg 241 , 0.3–2% of vardenafil 245, 246 , and 0.1% of tadalafil users 247 . The symptoms tend to be mild, transient, dose-dependent, and completely reversible.…”
Section: The No-gc-1-cgmp Pathway As a Target For Glaucoma Therapeuticsmentioning
confidence: 99%