The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2023
DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2023.2251382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-marketing safety of anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs): an analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)

Shu-Peng Zou,
Hai-Yun Yang,
Mengling Ouyang
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We noted a recently published FAERS study of post-marketing safety of anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibodies including mepolizumab (Zou et al, 2023). Data mining methods mainly include frequency analysis and Bayesian analysis, and the sensitivity of Bayesian analysis is relatively lower than that of frequency analysis .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We noted a recently published FAERS study of post-marketing safety of anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibodies including mepolizumab (Zou et al, 2023). Data mining methods mainly include frequency analysis and Bayesian analysis, and the sensitivity of Bayesian analysis is relatively lower than that of frequency analysis .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We noted a recently published FAERS study of post-marketing safety of anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibodies including mepolizumab ( Zou et al, 2023 ). Data mining methods mainly include frequency analysis and Bayesian analysis, and the sensitivity of Bayesian analysis is relatively lower than that of frequency analysis ( Liu et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meta-analyses and post-marketing US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) analyses did not show alarming adverse events. The most frequently reported adverse events include headache, nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infection, bronchitis, and asthma exacerbation [ 7 , 8 ]. According to FDA data, the proportion of serious adverse events with mepolizumab seems to be greater than benralizumab in each age group (≤20, 20–65, and ≥65 years); however, such data also include self-reports from patients and other confounding factors [ 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most frequently reported adverse events include headache, nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infection, bronchitis, and asthma exacerbation [ 7 , 8 ]. According to FDA data, the proportion of serious adverse events with mepolizumab seems to be greater than benralizumab in each age group (≤20, 20–65, and ≥65 years); however, such data also include self-reports from patients and other confounding factors [ 8 ]. Immunogenicity was tested for these drugs in phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs), testing positive for anti-drug antibodies in 4% of patients for mepolizumab (in most cases non-neutralizing) [ 9 ], in 4.8–5.4% for reslizumab (with no impact on exposure, blood eosinophils, clinical efficacy and safety) [ 10 ], and in 11–13% for benralizumab (with no associated adverse clinical outcomes) [ 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation