2021
DOI: 10.5507/bp.2020.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-infarction left ventricular free wall rupture: 12-years experience from the Cardiac Centre of the Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine in Prague, Czech Republic

Abstract: Background. Post-infarction left ventricular free wall rupture (LVFWR) is a feared and catastrophic complication of myocardial infarction that carries a high surgical and hospital mortality. Due to the rarity of this complication, little information exists on surgical treatment and outcomes. Goal and Methods. The goal of this study was to present our experience with LVFWR. We present a retrospective cohort of 19 consecutive patients who were surgically treated in the Cardiac Centre of the Institute of Clinical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our results did not show any benefit of intraoperative MCS insertion for in-hospital survival. Such a result may be explained by many factors, including the low adoption rate (n=5) We observed a high in-hospital mortality rate (almost one-third of the total patient population), which is consistent with the 17-34% operative mortality rate reported in the literature (4,5,(17)(18)(19). In the present study, female sex was a strong independent predictor for unfavorable in-hospital outcome.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, our results did not show any benefit of intraoperative MCS insertion for in-hospital survival. Such a result may be explained by many factors, including the low adoption rate (n=5) We observed a high in-hospital mortality rate (almost one-third of the total patient population), which is consistent with the 17-34% operative mortality rate reported in the literature (4,5,(17)(18)(19). In the present study, female sex was a strong independent predictor for unfavorable in-hospital outcome.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The study selection process and reasons for exclusion are described in Figure S1 . After removal of articles not pertinent to the design of the current study, 11 reports 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 with suitable data were included in the final meta‐analysis. All selected papers were published after 2001.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study found a clear negative effect of the postoperative VA-ECMO insertion with an increasing of 2.4-fold the odds of operative mortality.However, given the retrospective nature of the study, one can hypothesize that most of patients requiring postoperative VA-ECMO are part of the worst subgroup in terms of extension of myocardial infarction, myocardial tissue damage and irreversible brain damage and in such clinical scenario VA-ECMO institution maybe sometimes considered as compassionate use. Although the indications for VA-ECMO support are widely recognized, as well as the weaning and management strategies, in this meta-analysis it was not possible to identify the appropriate indications for the use of VA-ECMO in the postoperative period for two main reasons: first, few patients (26/363, 11%) received postoperative VA-ECMO support and of these it was not possible to identify exactly the causes determining the need for the mechanical support besides the CPB weaning failure; second, none of the four studies(10,11,13,14) that reported the postoperative VA-ECMO implant have focused on the indications and management strategies such as weaning due to myocardial recovery, bridging to the heart transplant or to long-term left ventricular assist device. Further studies are needed to address this issue thoroughly.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Our review identified five original studies with long-term outcome data for surgically managed FWR (Table 1) (20)(21)(22)(23)(24) Operative mortality among the studies ranged from 12-34%. In the study by Okamura et al, overall survival of 35 patients managed with sutureless repair without the use of CPB at 1, 5, and 10 years was 71.4%, 68.6%, and 62.9%, respectively.…”
Section: Left Ventricular Free Wall Rupturementioning
confidence: 99%