2022
DOI: 10.1080/01463373.2022.2154167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-incarcerated individuals’ online narratives: stories of desistance and “success”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specific to formerly incarcerated people, recent studies have found that they not only use technology for education but also engage in online spaces to reflect on their previous actions, engage in supportive relationships, and perform prosocial identities within the group (Hinck et al, 2022). These online spaces and the affordances they offer may provide vulnerable groups the support they need after being released from jail or prison.…”
Section: Educational Technology As a Learning Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specific to formerly incarcerated people, recent studies have found that they not only use technology for education but also engage in online spaces to reflect on their previous actions, engage in supportive relationships, and perform prosocial identities within the group (Hinck et al, 2022). These online spaces and the affordances they offer may provide vulnerable groups the support they need after being released from jail or prison.…”
Section: Educational Technology As a Learning Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once participants gave their oral consent, each interview was audiorecorded, transcribed, and loaded to Dedoose 9.0., a qualitative data analysis platform, to analyze interview transcripts. We conducted two rounds of coding (Hesse-Biber & Leavy, 2010;Rubin & Rubin, 2011;Strauss & Corbin, 1994). The first involved open coding to identify broad patterns and themes (Berg, 2018) across the interviews, which informed multiple empirical projects within the larger research program.…”
Section: Procedures and Codingmentioning
confidence: 99%