2006
DOI: 10.1007/bf02943646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-harvest quality deterioration of cane juice: physio-biochemical indicators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
13
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Anyway, the bacterial development was faster in energy cane juices than in the sugarcane juice, which may contribute to the faster deterioration in energy canes. The bacterial growth may be also responsible for the substantial decrease in juice pH from 5.5 to around 4.0 within 24 hours of storage ( Table 1) due to the production of organic acids (SINGH et al, 2006), especially by lactic acid bacteria (SOLOMON, 2000). Similarly, the number of total yeasts in the juice of variety VG11-X1 increased also faster along the storage time, showing the peak at 30 hours of storage ( Figure 1D), while for the juice of VG11-X2 the peak occurred at 48 hours ( Figure 1E).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anyway, the bacterial development was faster in energy cane juices than in the sugarcane juice, which may contribute to the faster deterioration in energy canes. The bacterial growth may be also responsible for the substantial decrease in juice pH from 5.5 to around 4.0 within 24 hours of storage ( Table 1) due to the production of organic acids (SINGH et al, 2006), especially by lactic acid bacteria (SOLOMON, 2000). Similarly, the number of total yeasts in the juice of variety VG11-X1 increased also faster along the storage time, showing the peak at 30 hours of storage ( Figure 1D), while for the juice of VG11-X2 the peak occurred at 48 hours ( Figure 1E).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sweet sorghum juice is extremely vulnerable to microbial spoilage on storage because of its high water activity (A w ) and rich sugar medium (Wu et al, 2010). It is also affected by enzymatic and acid deterioration reactions but to a much lesser degree than microbial deterioration (Eggleston, 2002;Singh et al, 2006). Juice microbial spoilage or deterioration represents a major technical challenge during the stabilization and storage of juices for any length of period (Wu et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of cane juice is also affected by chemical (acid) and enzymatic inversion (Singh et al 2006). The sugarcane plants have two kinds of invertases, namely neutral invertase (NI) and acid invertase (AI).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%