2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2014.05.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-glacial sea-level change along the Pacific coast of North America

Abstract: a b s t r a c tSea-level history since the Last Glacial Maximum on the Pacific margin of North America is complex and heterogeneous owing to regional differences in crustal deformation (neotectonics), changes in global ocean volumes (eustasy) and the depression and rebound of the Earth's crust in response to ice sheets on land (isostasy). At the Last Glacial Maximum, the Cordilleran Ice Sheet depressed the crust over which it formed and created a raised forebulge along peripheral areas offshore. This, combined… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
83
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 130 publications
(235 reference statements)
2
83
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Near the center of former northern hemisphere ice sheets (e.g., Hudson Bay), the rate of glacio-isostatic uplift exceeded the rate of eustatic sea-level rise during the Holocene [29]. But at the margins of the ice sheet (e.g., western Vancouver Island Canada), the rate of eustatic sea-level rise outpaced glacio-isostatic uplift until ∼7 ka, after which glacio-isostatic uplift became the dominant control on RSL, resulting in a mid-Holocene highstand [30].…”
Section: Spatial Variability Of Holocene Relative Sea-level Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Near the center of former northern hemisphere ice sheets (e.g., Hudson Bay), the rate of glacio-isostatic uplift exceeded the rate of eustatic sea-level rise during the Holocene [29]. But at the margins of the ice sheet (e.g., western Vancouver Island Canada), the rate of eustatic sea-level rise outpaced glacio-isostatic uplift until ∼7 ka, after which glacio-isostatic uplift became the dominant control on RSL, resulting in a mid-Holocene highstand [30].…”
Section: Spatial Variability Of Holocene Relative Sea-level Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A small RSL highstand <5 m was reached at 5.5 ka, followed by a slow rate of RSL fall of −0.4±1.2 m/ka during the late Holocene from 4 ka to present. The magnitude of the mid-Holocene highstand varies among regions formerly covered by the Cordilleran ice sheet with highstands considerably lower (~1.3 m) in central Alaska than in much of southern Alaska and British Columbia (up to 7.2 m), likely due to the influence of tectonics [94].…”
Section: Pacific Coastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, rising sea level since the last glacial maximum (LGM) has complicated our understanding of this time period by drowning former coastlines and inundating coastal archeological sites (Shackleton et al, 1988;Westley and Dix, 2006;Bailey and Flemming, 2008). Accurate reconstructions of ancient shorelines allow archeologists to understand better the environments in which people lived, to target areas where older sites might still be above water (i.e., Fedje et al, 2005;Shugar et al, 2005;McLaren et al, 2014), and to explore more efficiently the underwater environment for archeological sites.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%