2015
DOI: 10.1007/s40502-015-0187-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-flowering drought stress response of post-rainy sorghum genotypes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the variability, a narrow range of variation for DF was noted in all groups between irrigated and drought‐stressed conditions in both years (Table 2). Rakshit et al., (2016) reported a differential behaviour of genotypes under drought regarding flowering, where some genotypes had earlier flowering while others had late flowering. The similar performance of hybrids for DF even under contrasting water availability conditions verified here is an interesting result since these hybrids demonstrate certain predictability of behaviour, maintaining or varying in a few days their cycle under unfavourable water conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the variability, a narrow range of variation for DF was noted in all groups between irrigated and drought‐stressed conditions in both years (Table 2). Rakshit et al., (2016) reported a differential behaviour of genotypes under drought regarding flowering, where some genotypes had earlier flowering while others had late flowering. The similar performance of hybrids for DF even under contrasting water availability conditions verified here is an interesting result since these hybrids demonstrate certain predictability of behaviour, maintaining or varying in a few days their cycle under unfavourable water conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Rakshit et al (2016) In 2016, all genotypes showed better results when subjected to full irrigation (Table 7).…”
Section: Genotypesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two different types of stress responses were observed in sorghum at distinct time interval, i.e., pre-flowering and post-flowering drought response (Harris et al 2007). In sorghum, the green leaf area retention during the grain-filling stage has been found to be linked with sorghum post-flowering drought tolerance (Rakshit et al 2016). As reported by Deshpande et al (2016), seven sources for stay-green trait in sorghum have been used for QTL identification, such as B35 (Tuinstra et al 1997;Crasta et al 1999;Subudhi et al 2000;Xu 2000a, b;Sanchez et al 2002;Harris et al 2007), E36-1 (Haussmann et al 2002), QL41 (Tao et al 2000), SC56 (Kebede et al 2001), 296B (Srinivas et al 2009), SC283 (Sabadin et al 2012), and SDS 1948-3 (Habyarimana et al 2010.…”
Section: Droughtmentioning
confidence: 99%