2018
DOI: 10.1071/wf17148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-fire surface fuel dynamics in California forests across three burn severity classes

Abstract: Forest wildfires consume fuel and are followed by post-fire fuel accumulation. This study examines post-fire surface fuel dynamics over 9 years across a wide range of conditions characteristic of California fires in dry conifer and hardwood forests. We estimated post-fire surface fuel loadings (Mgha−1) from 191 repeatedly measured United States national inventory plots in dry conifer and hardwood stands of 49 California forest wildfires and identified differences across fire severity classes – low, moderate an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This addresses the issue of field inventory and remote sensing‐based approach, which are usually for shorter‐term analysis (Bartels et al, ; Eskelson & Monleon, ; Haslem et al, ). Fifth, the lack of pre‐fire data has made the comparison between pre‐fire and post‐fire fuel loads difficult (Eskelson & Monleon, ). The unknown pre‐disturbance forest conditions have also made the estimation of fire‐induced carbon loss challenging (Frolking et al, ; Liu et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This addresses the issue of field inventory and remote sensing‐based approach, which are usually for shorter‐term analysis (Bartels et al, ; Eskelson & Monleon, ; Haslem et al, ). Fifth, the lack of pre‐fire data has made the comparison between pre‐fire and post‐fire fuel loads difficult (Eskelson & Monleon, ). The unknown pre‐disturbance forest conditions have also made the estimation of fire‐induced carbon loss challenging (Frolking et al, ; Liu et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigating vegetation recovery through field measurement has been used by many researchers, such as Coppoletta et al (2016) and Miranda et al (2016). Detailed studies involving site-specific repeated measurements are considered the most accurate (e.g., Eskelson & Monleon, 2018); however, there are three drawbacks (Bartels et al, 2016;Eskelson & Monleon, 2018;Miranda et al, 2016;Turner et al, 1999). First, field-based estimations of forest structural recovery are usually an expensive and time-consuming endeavor.…”
Section: Post-disturbance Field Observationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations