2001
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post‐fire runoff and erosion from rainfall simulation: contrasting forests with shrublands and grasslands

Abstract: Abstract:Rainfall simulations allow for controlled comparisons of runoff and erosion among ecosystems and land cover conditions. Runoff and erosion can increase greatly following fire, yet there are few rainfall simulation studies for post-fire plots, particularly after severe fire in semiarid forest. We conducted rainfall simulations shortly after a severe fire (Cerro Grande) in ponderosa pine forest near Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA, which completely burned organic ground cover and exposed unprotected soil. M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

16
201
0
7

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 247 publications
(224 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
16
201
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Cumulatively, these effects can increase runoff, peak flow magnitude, flooding, surface erosion, sediment delivery to channels, channel bed and bank erosion, sediment concentration, turbidity and potentially soil mass movements including debris flows (Helvey 1980;Swanson 1981;Johansen et al 2001;Conedera et al 2003;Wondzell & King 2003;Lane et al 2006). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cumulatively, these effects can increase runoff, peak flow magnitude, flooding, surface erosion, sediment delivery to channels, channel bed and bank erosion, sediment concentration, turbidity and potentially soil mass movements including debris flows (Helvey 1980;Swanson 1981;Johansen et al 2001;Conedera et al 2003;Wondzell & King 2003;Lane et al 2006). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In coniferous forest and chaparral ecosystems, moderate-and high-severity fires can induce a water-repellent layer at or below the soil surface, and this can greatly reduce the infiltration rate (DeBano, 1981;Imeson et al, 1992). The loss of ground cover by burning increases rain-splash erosion, may induce soil sealing, decreases surface roughness, and reduces the time to initial runoff (DeBano et al, 1998;Johansen et al, 2001). By removing most or all of the vegetative, litter, and duff cover, high-severity wildfires reduce water losses through interception and transpiration, and this can further increase runoff.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The next threshold (categories 2.0 and 3.0) is for areas that have between 0% and 85% surface organic material. Literature on post-fire erosion and hydrophobic soils identifies thresholds across a range of surface organic material percentages (30%, [50]; 40%, [51]; 45%, [54]; 50%, [52]) from which we selected the median (40%) to divide the categories where 2.0 is 40-85% and 3.0 is less than 40%. We further categorized them by mineral soil char color using a decimal.…”
Section: S U B G U B G U B G O Biological Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common soil physical properties influenced by fire include water repellency, structure stability, texture, color, post-fire surface temperatures, and abundance of surface organic material [48] (Table 3). Typically erosion only occurs when organic cover is less than 40-50% after a fire [50][51][52]54]. Therefore, if slopes are steep and coarse textured soils are present, post-fire soil erosion is likely to occur in areas with PFI categories of 3.0 to 4.0.…”
Section: Relating the Pfi To Post-fire Physical Soil Responsementioning
confidence: 99%