2000
DOI: 10.1097/00002030-200008180-00029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-exposure prophylaxis with highly active antiretroviral therapy could not protect macaques from infection with SIV/HIV chimera

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the same manner as in HIV-positive patients, hematological alterations are commonly found in SIV-infected macaques (16,17). We recently reported that treatment of macaques with a combination of zidovudine, lamivudine, and indinavir, initiated as early as 4 h after intravenous exposure to SHIV 89.6P and maintained for 4 weeks, failed to prevent infection but has long-lasting beneficial effects on the plasma viral load and blood CD4 ϩ cell counts (21). Here, we extended our study to the consequences on bone marrow hematopoiesis of early HAART in macaques infected with pathogenic SHIV 89.6P.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the same manner as in HIV-positive patients, hematological alterations are commonly found in SIV-infected macaques (16,17). We recently reported that treatment of macaques with a combination of zidovudine, lamivudine, and indinavir, initiated as early as 4 h after intravenous exposure to SHIV 89.6P and maintained for 4 weeks, failed to prevent infection but has long-lasting beneficial effects on the plasma viral load and blood CD4 ϩ cell counts (21). Here, we extended our study to the consequences on bone marrow hematopoiesis of early HAART in macaques infected with pathogenic SHIV 89.6P.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitor tenofovir {9-[2-(phosphonomethoxy)propyl]adenine} has been used extensively in this macaque model of AIDS because of its unprecedented efficacy, compared to other compounds, to prevent infection or suppress viremia (33, 55, 64, 69-71, 75-79, 80, 82, 85, 88). Most other commonly used antiviral drugs that have been tested in the macaque model were usually able to delay or reduce the peak of primary viremia if given early during infection, but in contrast to tenofovir, these other drugs were not very efficient in suppressing viremia once virus dissemination was already well established or the emergence of drug-resistant viral mutants inevitably led to increased virus replication and disease (22,30,35,47,70,84,87,90,102).The reasons for this high efficacy of tenofovir in the macaque model have been unclear but warrant further investigation, as this could lead to the development of additional antiviral strategies. The experiments described here demonstrate that suppression of viremia during tenofovir treatment of SIV-infected macaques requires CD8 ϩ -cell-mediated antiviral immune responses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study showed that a combination of neutralizing antibodies given to neonates at 1 hour and 8 days post-challenge led to 100% protection in animals infected with a SHIV, but did not protect animals from a more pathogenic virus (Hofmann-Lehmann et al, 2001). This same highly pathogenic virus also failed to be controlled by triple therapy of AZT, 3TC, and the protease inhibitor indinavir when initiated 4 hours after intravenous infection and continued for 14-28 days (Bourry et al, 2009;Le Grand et al, 2000). These studies noted that although most of the animals became infected, plasma viremia was reduced compared to the control animals, suggesting a partial protective effect of the treatment regimens.…”
Section: Post-exposure Prophylaxismentioning
confidence: 96%