2015
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010586.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-exposure passive immunisation for preventing rubella and congenital rubella syndrome

Abstract: Post-exposure passive immunisation for preventing rubella and congenital rubella syndrome.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another option to prevent congenital Zika virus infections in pregnant women would be the administration of human or humanized antibodies (74,119,122,123). Passive immunoglobulin therapies have been established previously for preventing birth defects caused by other viruses such as rubella virus, varicella-zoster virus, or cytomegaloviruses (162)(163)(164). The demonstration that some of the Zika virus E-specific antibodies have very strong neutralizing activities (Table 1) makes them attractive for passive immunotherapy.…”
Section: Antibodies and Passive Immunizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another option to prevent congenital Zika virus infections in pregnant women would be the administration of human or humanized antibodies (74,119,122,123). Passive immunoglobulin therapies have been established previously for preventing birth defects caused by other viruses such as rubella virus, varicella-zoster virus, or cytomegaloviruses (162)(163)(164). The demonstration that some of the Zika virus E-specific antibodies have very strong neutralizing activities (Table 1) makes them attractive for passive immunotherapy.…”
Section: Antibodies and Passive Immunizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of the guidelines examined cite a recent Cochrane review on the subject of the effectiveness of passive immunization for preventing rubella. 51 The review concludes that IG seems to be of benefit for preventing rubella up to 5 d after exposure, but notes the lack of evidence directly in relation to the prevention of congenital rubella syndrome.…”
Section: Intravenousmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Für den Zeitraum in dem eine aktive PEP-Impfung nicht möglich ist, sollte nach einem relevanten Masernkontakt eine postexpositionelle passive Immunisierung mittels polyvalenter-IgG-Gabe möglichst innerhalb von 6 Tagen nach Exposition erfolgen (polyvalentes IgG 1 × 400 mg/kgKG i. v.; Off-Label-Gebrauch) [327,330]. Gegen Röteln kann eine postexpositionelle passive Impfung mit polyvalentem-IgG erwogen werden, da die Gabe innerhalb von 5 Tagen nach Exposition klinische Symptome abschwächen und die Ausscheidung des Virus sowie eine Virämie senken kann [301,387]. Eine postexpositionelle passive Impfung gegen Mumps wird aufgrund der fehlenden Effektivität nicht empfohlen [58,287].…”
Section: Postexpositionelle Impfungen Mit Lebendimpfstoffenunclassified