Post-Disaster Mental Health Among Parent–Child Dyads After a Major Earthquake in Indonesia

Abstract

The interdependent adjustment of children and their parents following disasters has been well documented. We used the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model (APIM) to provide an appropriate analytical framework for examining how family members may contribute to each other’s post-disaster mental health. Independent self-reports were collected from parent–child dyads (n=397) residing in a rural community in Indonesia that was devastated by a major earthquake. Elementary school children (M=10 years; 51 % female) and one of their parents (M=41 years; 73 % female) each reported on their disaster exposure, posttraumatic stress (PTS) symptoms, and general distress. The APIM was used to examine mental health within dyads and moderation by gender across dyads. Children reported lower disaster exposure and fewer PTS symptoms, but similar general distress levels, as their parents. Children’s and parents’ disaster-specific PTS symptoms were the strongest predictor of their own general distress. Parents’ PTS symptoms were associated with children’s general distress (b=0.14, p<0.001), but children’s PTS symptoms were not associated with parents’ general distress (b=−0.02, p>0.05). Findings were not moderated by parents’ or children’s gender. Although children and parents may respond differently to natural disasters, they may be best understood as a dyad. APIM analyses provide new evidence suggesting a unidirectional path of influence from parents’ disaster-related symptomatology to children’s general mental health. Dyadic approaches to understanding mental health and treating symptoms of distress among disaster survivors and their families following trauma are encouraged.

Testing the Effects of COVID-19 Confinement in Spanish Children: The Role of Parents’ Distress, Emotional Problems and Specific Parenting

“…Importantly, the existence of cascading effects from the psychosocial context to the child’s adaptations does not imply that the reversed effects are negligible [ 5 ]. So far, the study of bidirectional relations between parents and children in collective disasters has been very scarce; some studies have reported that, within this kind of context, the effects mainly run from parents to children, and not in the opposite direction [ 68 ]. Nevertheless, more research is clearly needed in order to delineate the reciprocal influences within the family dynamics in the COVID-19 crisis.…”

Distance learning, parent-child interactions, and affective well-being of parents and children during the COVID-19 pandemic: A daily diary study

“…In the face of community traumata, previous research has shown that parents' perceived distress is interrelated with their children's distress, well-being, and adjustment (e.g., Chemtob et al, 2010; see Eltanamly et al, 2019, for a meta-analysis). For instance, parental posttraumatic stress following a major earthquake was significantly related to children's distress (Juth et al, 2015). Similarly, after the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing, higher caregiver distress was associated with greater child posttraumatic stress (Kerns et al, 2014).…”

Kajian Sosiologis tentang Kebencanaan Kaitannya dengan Penguatan dan Ketahanan Keluarga dalam Menghadapi Bencana Alam

“…Studi yang dilakukan oleh Juth, dkk [8] menunjukkan bahwa bencana alam, dengan kadar kerusakan alam yang berbeda-beda, juga mempengaruhi tingkat kesehatan mental para korbannya. Studi yang dilakukan pada keluarga-keluarga di pedesaan Indonesia yang terdampak bencan alam, khususnya pada orang tua dan anak-anak yang menjadi satu kesatuan dalam keluarga, menunjukkan bahwa kekuatan ikatan antara orangtua dan anak-anak dapat mempengaruhi kesehatan mental mereka ketika terjadi bencana alam.…”