2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-deployment usability evaluation of a radiology workstation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They are not monoliths designed by a single manufacturer, but are composed of multiple software solutions with varying degrees of interoperability. Software products may lack features desired by the user or have limited capacity for modification (1,4,7,8).…”
Section: Solution Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They are not monoliths designed by a single manufacturer, but are composed of multiple software solutions with varying degrees of interoperability. Software products may lack features desired by the user or have limited capacity for modification (1,4,7,8).…”
Section: Solution Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if the final product of the radiologist's labor is communicated in two words (such as "macro normal"), a computer interface requires further effort. These activities include reacting to dialog boxes, entering passwords, and completing more complex interactions that require navigating electronic medical records (EMRs) (3,4). Because a radiologist's work is repetitive, these small tasks combine to become a significant factor in loss of productivity, user dissatisfaction, fatigue, and injury (5)(6)(7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, their duty is carried out in a highly demanding clinical environment, where both image quality and patient throughput are to be maximized; this has the consequence of minimum (or null) scanner time allocation for training. Moreover, the software installed in these machines poses additional difficulties, even for experienced radiologists [ 2 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Better thinking aloud could have generated more insights into "why to use which user interface element at a certain location". Generally, as stated by Jorritsma (2016), user interaction log data analysis in usability evaluation can be used for guiding other sources of data collection. For example, the log data analysis in this evaluation has found a more frequent use of the map view to retrieve POI information than using the AR view.…”
Section: Interactions With the User Interfaces Of Geofara Based On Inmentioning
confidence: 99%