2024
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1356285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-COVID-19 pandemic organ donation activities in Germany: a multicenter retrospective analysis

Jan Sönke Englbrecht,
Daniel Schrader,
Jörg Benedikt Alders
et al.

Abstract: IntroductionThe COVID-19 pandemic had a negative impact on the number of solid organ transplantations. After a global decline of 16% in 2020, their numbers subsequently returned to pre-pandemic levels. In contrast, numbers in Germany remained almost constant in 2020 and 2021 but fell by 6.9% in 2022. The reasons for this divergent development are unknown.MethodsThe number of deceased with a severe brain damage, potential and utilized donors after braindeath and the intensive care unit treatment capacity were r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 48 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall incidence of BD, and numbers of potential and utilized DBD was very low in our cohort of patients with severe BI, comparable to previous findings in patients after DC 22 and to potential donor numbers in Germany 38 40 and elsewhere 41 . Others reported a BD incidence of 7.3% in patients after DC 22 , which is comparable to our results (confirmed BD in 8 out of 136 patients with DC, which corresponds to 5.8%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Overall incidence of BD, and numbers of potential and utilized DBD was very low in our cohort of patients with severe BI, comparable to previous findings in patients after DC 22 and to potential donor numbers in Germany 38 40 and elsewhere 41 . Others reported a BD incidence of 7.3% in patients after DC 22 , which is comparable to our results (confirmed BD in 8 out of 136 patients with DC, which corresponds to 5.8%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%