2016
DOI: 10.4337/9781784711986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-Communist Welfare States in European Context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
41
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, policy-makers in the post-communist countries deliberately used social policies to prevent public protest against the reforms [e.g. Offe 1996;Vanhuysse 2006] and developed the various types of hybrid welfare regimes that are in place today which combine liberal policies with conservative-Bismarckian and socialdemocratic universalist policies [Cerami 2006;Inglot 2008;Hemerijck 2013;Kuitto 2016].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, policy-makers in the post-communist countries deliberately used social policies to prevent public protest against the reforms [e.g. Offe 1996;Vanhuysse 2006] and developed the various types of hybrid welfare regimes that are in place today which combine liberal policies with conservative-Bismarckian and socialdemocratic universalist policies [Cerami 2006;Inglot 2008;Hemerijck 2013;Kuitto 2016].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Komparativní studie potvrdily, že všechny postkomunistické státy vydávají v úhrnu menší podíl hrubého domácího produktu (HDP) na veřejnou sociální péči v porovnání s většinou zemí bývalé západní Evropy [Kuitto 2016]. Zúžíme-li však úhel pohledu pouze na podporu péče o nejmenší děti, částky věnované na tuto oblast nejsou o tolik nižší, liší se však jejich struktura.…”
Section: Státní Podpora Rodičovské Péče a Formální Péče O Předškolní unclassified
“…A more recent example is provided by Kati Kuitto (2016) who carried out a comparative statistical analysis of European countries, including ten CEE EU-member countries, 2 across three dimensions of welfare provision: first, in terms of the organisational principles of welfare provision (that is, whether welfare provision was financed mainly from social contributions collected from employers and employees along the lines of a Bismarckian approach, or whether welfare was financed mainly from tax revenue along Beveridgean lines); second, welfare policy emphasis (whether welfare support was targeted towards cash spending on specific categories such as old age pensions and sickness benefits, or towards social services); and third, decommodifying potential (the degree of generosity of support that effectively compensates for loss of income from labour or other markets).…”
Section: The Welfare Regime Debate and Central And Eastern Europementioning
confidence: 99%