2019
DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.6219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for non-seminomatous germ cell tumors: A single-surgeon, Canadian experience

Abstract: Introduction: Post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PCRPLND) has a well-established role in the management of residual retroperitoneal masses >1cm in patients with advanced non-seminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT). Herein, we report our singlesurgeon surgical experience in a Canadian tertiary hospital. Methods: We identified 57 patients with NSGCT who received primary chemotherapy and PCRPLND from 2010–2016. Surgical complication rate was graded with Clavien-Dindo classification. Ch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The predictive value of IGCCCG prognostic groups for pcRPLND necrosis/fibrosis was evaluable in six studies of 794 patients ( 35 , 36 , 46 – 49 ) (see Supplement 2 ). There was no significant association of necrosis/fibrosis at pcRPLND between IGCCCG good-risk NSGCT compared to IGCCCG intermediate-risk (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.48-1.97), poor-risk (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.40-1.31), and intermediate- or poor-risk disease (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.66-1.93).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The predictive value of IGCCCG prognostic groups for pcRPLND necrosis/fibrosis was evaluable in six studies of 794 patients ( 35 , 36 , 46 – 49 ) (see Supplement 2 ). There was no significant association of necrosis/fibrosis at pcRPLND between IGCCCG good-risk NSGCT compared to IGCCCG intermediate-risk (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.48-1.97), poor-risk (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.40-1.31), and intermediate- or poor-risk disease (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.66-1.93).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, heterogeneity was generally considered to be low in our analysis, except for the IGCCCG prognostic group. Additionally, the inclusion of a small number of participants with residual masses less than 1 cm ( 15 , 37 ) and stage 1S disease [n=1 ( 46 )], which lies outside current treatment recommendations, introduces possible bias. Additionally, the large dataset by Vergouwe at al ( 37 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although major intraoperative complications are at times unavoidable in both open and robotic cohorts, we postulate that robotic surgery is likely to provide a significant reduction in wound complications, ileus, atelectasis, and thromboembolic events due to smaller wounds, lower analgesia requirements, and earlier mobility. In recent open series, 1%–3% of patients suffered a thrombosis-related complication and up to 4.7% a wound related complication [ [22] , [23] , [24] ]; however, reported complication rates vary widely, and highly specialised centres report lower rates [ 5 ]. None of this type of complication was seen in this series and although the literature so far is limited to case series, it is reasonable to expect that this lower rate of complications will continue in robotic series given data from other minimally invasive surgery [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Progression after RPLND is a major problem, with a rate of viable tumor in 9-31% of patients in pathology reports after RPLND, indicating the need of additional treatment 5,[7][8][9] . On the other hand, teratoma is known to be chemoresistant and has the potential for malignant transformation and RPLND is curative in this setting 10,11 . There have been described important survival factors in patients with viable tumors 5,12,13 , and recommended to remove all residual lesions larger than 1 cm in patients with NSGCT [14][15][16] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%